Free Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 81.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 476 Words, 2,926 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22875/57.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Connecticut ( 81.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Connecticut
ase 3:03-cv-00945-CFD Document 57 Filed 1 1/24/2003 Page 1 of 3
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
, CLARENCE R. COLLINS, JR., ET AL, : 3:03 CV 00945 (CFD)
for themselves and on behalf of a class similarly :
situated property owners, :
Plaintiffs,
v.
OLIN CORPORATION and the TOWN
OF HAMDEN, :
: NOVEMBER 24, 2003
Defendants. :
MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
IN EXCESS OF TEN PAGES
Pursuant to D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7, the defendant, Olin Corporation ("Olin"), hereby seeks
the Court’s permission to tile its Reply Brief with respect to Olin’s multiple Motions to Dismiss
in this matter, which exceeds ten pages. The Reply brief contains twenty two pages of text.
Olin originally filed six separate Motions to Dismiss addressing the various counts of the
plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint contains 121 numbered paragraphs of
allegations, some of which contain multiple subparts, and is brought in seventeen separate
counts, nine of which are directed to Olin. Olin tiled separate Motions to Dismiss in order to
address separate legal issues and for ease of briefing, argument and decision. The Court
previously granted Olin’s motion to exceed the forty page limit for its original Motions to
Dismiss. Because of the complex factual and legal issues raised by the Amended Complaint,
Olin requires additional pages in order to address each legal issue completely.

ase 3:03-cv-00945-CFD Document 57 Filed 1 1/24/2003 Page 2 of 3
Plaintiffs’ counsel has been contacted and has no objection to the extra twelve pages.
Wherefore, Olin respectfully requests that this Motion for Permission to File its Reply
Brief in Excess of Ten Pages be granted.
DEFENDANT,
OLIN CORPORATION
By:
‘ Sandra K. Davis (CT 020175)
Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP
CityPlace I, 185 Asylum Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06103-3402
Telephone: 860-509-6500
Fax: 860-509-6501
- 2 -

ase 3:03-cv-00945-CFD Document 57 Filed 1 1/24/2003 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on this 24"` day of November, 2003, a copy of the foregoing Motion
for Permission was mailed, lst Class, postage prepaid, to the following:
David B. Zabel Ann M. Catino
Monte E. Frank Joseph G Fortner, J r.
Cohen and Wolf, P.C. Halloran & Sage LLP
115 Broad Street One Goodwin Square
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604 225 Asylum Street
Telephone: (203) 368-0211 Hartford, CT 06103
Facsimile: (203) 394-9901 Telephone: (860) 522-6108
Facsimile: (860) 548-0006
and
Mark Roberts Attorneys for Town of Hamden
McRoberts & Roberts, LLP
101 Merrimac Street
Boston, MA 02114
Telephone: (617) 722-8222
Facsimile: (617) 720-2320
and
Neil T. Leifer
David C. Strouss
Thornton & Naumes L.L.P.
100 Summer Street, 30th Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Telephone: (617) 720-1333
Attorneys for Plaintw
By:
andra K. Davis
40179627 v\1 - davissk — x6srO1l.doc — 70042/5
- 3 -