Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I " case 3:O3ecv¥IOO9IZlI5-CFD Document 52 ‘Fi1éd‘*i"i0/21/2003 Page ‘r of 1 I · I
0;-);.::;,., V { ; w V I
- 6:-’r? H
cewaqsmxme MIITVM, I
¤ . WWII
IT`? I IZ? I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTLM go _
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ; I C»CC 2
.. .“._ Y I
CLARENCE COLLINS, JR., ET AL, : &l I
Plaintiffs, : CIVIL ACTION NO. I I I
: 3-03—cv—945 (CFD) 7
V- :
OLIN CORPORATION, ET AL, : OCTOBER 16, 2003
Defendants -: I
I
-- _ ._ JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE:
P1 _ BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ARGUMENT I
(:;,e·~·, ’·' IQ.; WITH RESPECT TO I
YY. ji; DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS y
—é."’ `E F - Y =— F I I
w A- "“ _e_fPZursuant to D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(b), the parties jointly move for an extension of time.
3 M" of one wool; xvith respect to thc hrieting schedule concerning the defendants motions to I
I ‘ "I I
Q , dismiss.
\§ Accordingly, the plaintiffs request that they be permitted to file their opposition brief I
I
(___ 5 to the motions to dismiss on or before October 27, 2003. This is the second request for an
Q _ extension of time with respect to the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The additional one week
I
ii ` period is necessary because ofthe voluminous nature of the motions and the plaintiffs’ R
Q Q \ counseIs’ trial schedules during the month of September. The defendants consent to this I
‘°•` I
extension. R
I
I