Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 101.2 kB
Pages: 4
Date: February 25, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 865 Words, 5,485 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22875/47.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 101.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
rw. ’‘‘‘ Eggg§(j§;" g`"""‘D6?: l¥|é?" —¤+4~—| {
i ` 7) ,
i l i l l
l iii P. it [ {
UNITED sraras nrsrruer comm Fit] liiil l `1 i**’ l= C? 53 {
"‘°""*"°" °‘“ °°N“E°“°"T ,_,, i ; i mr
cmaawcs 11. COLLINS, JR., et si. ; cum, Acrton No. z:os¥cv3§4§${@1=*Ei5§
OLIN CORPORATION, et al. OCTOBER 14. 2003 } i
MOTION FOR EKTENSION QE TIME é .
Pursuant to Local Rule ‘7(b) ofthe Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for i `
the District of Comtectiout, Plaintiffs Clarence R. Collins, Jr., et al. (the ”P1aintiffs"), hereby request i
an extension of time of thirty (30) days to and including November 19, 2003 to file answers or
objections to Defendant Town of Hamdcn's First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for j
Production (the "Hamden Discovery Requests") in the above captioned action, and for an extension Q
of thirteen (13) days to and including November 19, 2003, to tile answers or objections to Defendant I
Olin Corporations First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production (the "Olin {
Discovery Requcsts"). In support of this motion, the Plaintiffs respectfully represent:
1. The Hamden Discovery Requests were served on September 18, 2003. Accordingly, i
objections or answers to the Hamden Discovery Requests are due on October 20, 2003, unless the 1
time for tiling such answers or objections is extended.
2. The Olin Discovery Requests were served on October 7, 2003. Accordingly, objections
or answers to the Olin Discovery Requests are due on November 6, 2003, tmless the time for tiling
such answers or objections is extended.
ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED
i
!
i
i l
anew - srssvssswmm,.,.s...,s.,., "“"“"”“*“ i
____n_w_1`H__n_1l_—_—_h—i_ g
-¤—..o.-.- ,___o_____m_________*—“_%`¤%_
;”;__________M_______"_1_nr_I“—*—b"“___ `
"“"‘im*“"rr
" -- :.. - —---: —; -4 is- e;.¢2e·‘%H?i T j · ri
Pl? ii `_" ii n-iii P1 _-;;--_ gi _ gi li;-H- -i
le-—e——-— e—.e—».;;;; _` T _ DD_ HK ‘_‘ T "1"Z c ·;·;· t :1: no ,_ in ___ _ _ nn _ ,n _
-;# zi or is iii ti, Ti? ti D QT ji TY I 121

_ a-_.._L [
Case 3:03-cv-0094%% FD Document 47-2 Filed 10/17/2003 Page 2 of 4 | .
- CQ) (
i
l
3. Counsel for the Plaintiffs need additional time to gather the information necessary to i
_ respond to the Hamden Discovery Requests and the Olin Discovery Requests, and has been working i
with counsel in Massachusetts to gather such infomation. I
4. Counsel for the Plaintiffs has asked counsel for defendant Town of Hamden whether
there is agreement or objection to this Motion for Extension of Time, and said counsel, Ann M.
Catino, Esq., has consented to the extension of time requested herein.
5. Counsel for the Plaintiffs has asked counsel for defendant Olin Corporation whether E
there is agreement or obj ection to this Motion for Extension of Time, and said counsel, Joel B. {
Samson, Esq., has consented to the extension of time requested herein.
6. I This is the iirst Motion for Extension of Time tiled by the Plaintiffs with respect to the i
time to file an answers or objections to the Hamden Discovery Requests and the Olin Discovery i
Requests. 1
I
{ i
i
{
1
1

Case 3:03-cv-00945-C FD Document 47-2 Filed 10/17/2003 Page 3 of 4 H I
<;> <.> I I
I
I
I I
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court extend to and including
November 19, 2003, the time within which the Plaintiffs may tile answers or objections to the I
_ . I
Hamden Discovery Requests and the Olin Discovery Requests in the above-captioned action.
T PLAINTJFFS, I
By · I
David B. Z sq. ct013S2
dZ3bB}@COh.31]ElHdW0lf;C0m ,
Monte E. Frank, Esq. ct13666
1nI’[email protected] com
Cohen and Wolf} PC I
1115 Broad Street I
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604 I I
Tele: (203) 368-0211 I
Fax: (203) 394-9901
I
Mark Roberts, Esq. I
mrobggs@n1cmbcrtsand1·obe.rts.com
McRoberts & Roberts, LLP E
101 Merriman Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02114 I
Tele: (617) 722-8222
Fax: (617) 720-2320 I
Neil T. Leifer, Esq.
[email protected]
David C. Strcuss, Esq.
[email protected]
Thornton & Naumes L.L.P
100 Summer Street, 30m Floor .
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
. Tele: (617) 720-1333 I
Fax: (617) 720-2445
I
3 I {
______i


I
..-.—,,..;..t.__,____ I
Case 3:03-cv-OO94?%FD Document 47-2 Filed 10/17/2003 Page 4 of 4 I
I
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I I
I hereby certify that on the date hereoti a copy of the foregoing was served by first class U.S. I
mail, postage prepaid, upon all coun el and pro se parties of record, as follows: I
Aim M. Catino, Esq.
Joseph G. Former, Jr., Esq.
Laurie R. Steinberg, Esq.
Brian D. Rich, Esq. I
I-IALLORAN & SAGE LLP I
One Goodwin Square
225 Asylum Street I
Hartford, CT 06103 5
2 I
Michael H. Wetmore, Esq. I I
Joel B. Samson, Esq. I
HUSCH & EPPENBERGER, LLC I
190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600 I
St. Louis, MO 63105 I
Sandra K. Davis, Esq.
Mark S. Baldwin, Esq. ‘ I
BROWN RUDNICK BERLACK ISRAELS LLP
ISS Asylum Street, 38m Floor ‘
Hartford, CT 06103-3402
I
David abel

I I
I I
I
I I
I
4 I I