Free Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

pv$945-CFD Document 58 Fi|eQ1/25/2003 Page 1 of 1 . l
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ H8
li ` , FOR THE lull} NOV 2l-l FJ 3‘
f S~Di‘ ,, DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT _
` ._ 1 rg [3l$`l`RlCl CUUR l i
€, - 1··li~.RTFORU Cl I
A r ·~•’l NCE R. COLLINS, JR., ET AL, ; 3:03 CV 00945 (CFD)<%“{ `
for themselves and on behalf of a class similarly ;
situated property owners, : - l
Z I
Plaintiffs, :
OLIN CORPORATION and the TOWN
_• F HAMDEN, ;
A , ., ; NOVEMBER 24, 2003
E ·-4 ° Defendants. :
e a I 1
*5 ·· , Q _ f MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF l
/ Q · - IN EXCESS OF TEN PAGES 1
- I · $‘ I;
g l I E Pursuant to D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7, the defendant, Olin Corporation ("Olin"), hereby seeks
l ~ · · 2
;\1 e ‘ :3 the s permission to file its Reply Brief with respect to Olin’s multiple Motions to Dismiss
= i i · no- ii; I
f" { in this matgéré,-Jwhich exceeds ten pages. The Reply brief contains twenty two pages of text.
· n <-¤ r
0 .- `· i ii? LD Olin §‘iginally filed six separate Motions to Dismiss addressing the various counts of the
Q cxr iii.; *~*·
plalrjliffs ’lf§§Eended Complaint. The Amended Complaint contains 121 numbered paragraphs of
l·a1€x»·` "":‘“ QLZQ *:1.:
alle@tiori. counts, nine of which are directed to Olin. Olin tiled separate Motions to Dismiss in order to
address separate legal issues and for ease of briefing, argument and decision. The Court
previously granted Olin’s motion to exceed the forty page limit for its original Motions to
Dismiss. Because of the complex factual and legal issues raised by the Amended Complaint,
Olin requires additional pages in order to address each legal issue completely.
C st.t f
*·’‘ J "·» is l
‘ ··‘ *·----—·-—-·~———-·——·—···——- __ _____ I
7 - 7 - 7 - 7 ---77V---777---777---rrr----rrr---rr7---777---77V--ir7---77r`--'rr·--rrr.--,rr_--rr--rr""
- 7 --7 - 7 - 777----77-r---CCN--rrr---rrr---rrr---777---777---77l--rrr--ir"--*77--177.--_rr--rr--rr"