Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

Merchant Transaction Systems, Inc.
vs.
Nelcela, Inc., and Arizona Corporation;
Len Campagna, An Arizona Resident;
Alec Dollarhide, an Arizona Reseident;
Ebocom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation;
POST Integrations, Inc., an Hlinois Corporation
=l< >|< >l< >I<
And related cross and third-party claims.
CIV 02-1954-PHX-MHM
POST, LEXCEL, AND MTSI PARTIES’ NOTICE OF FHsH\IG SUPPLEMENT TO EXI-HBIT
39 TO POST, LEXCEL, AND MTSI PARTIES’ STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF
CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE Hi OPPOSITION TO NELCELA’S MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EXHIBIT 1
Signature of Gene Clothier to Addendum to Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release
1726977.1
Case 2:02-cv-01954-IVIHIVI Document 355-2 Filed O4/O7/2006 Page 1 of 3

S, _ -. _ Fed.R.Evtd. 408 _- "' ‘ V ` - "· .
Q ‘ . ` V Se¤1ementCo m¤nieation W _ z . l _` _-
` T- S- l —
WHEREAS the Lexcel·Parties, MTSI Parties, and POST Parties previously ' ` _ l V `
entered into a Settlement Agreement to resolve any claims that may exist between them, . · , _
andgto resolve only such claims; . _. __ . - _ _ - " . · A ‘
Â¥ _ WHEREAS aprincipallreason for the Settlement Agreement vvas the fact that each _ U
ofthe Parties has been the victim of fiaud and/or other misconduct perpetrated by the _
Nel1:elaDefendants; ` ` · P · ` . " _ I ’ - —
S WHEREAS none ofthe Parties have released any of their claims against the I 2 . l
Nelbela Defendants; and . . ` _ ‘ - · ·
WHEREAS the Parties have learned that the Nelcela Defendants areattempting to _ _
miseonsuue the release provisions stated in'§ 5 of the Settlement Agreement; _- ' ‘ Q _
The Parties hereby enter into this Addendum to the Settlement Agreement Z. '· ._
clarify their intent as set forth in § 5 ofthe Settlement Agreement. ‘ _ _ " · _ y ·
1Z.§ nE5;z~_;_1·rt0Ns·’ U. ' ‘ _i .
1.1. "Settlement Agreement" means the Settlement Agreement and Mutual I ‘· I ·. l
g f Release between the Parties, which they entered into on-January 20, 2006. ·· . { ‘ ‘ _
i 1.2. The definitions contained in the Settlement Agreement are incorporated U
intotl1isAddendum. Y " . .- » -
‘ 3. Manmgornmnamasn- - ‘ ` _
2 2.1. The mutual release set forth in § S of the Settlement Agreement was U ` ‘ ‘
_ intended only to release claims betweenxhe Parties, including claims based · _ n _
on actions taken by employees or agents of the Parties acting in their". _ _ g
A capacity as an employee or agent of one of the Parties. _ ·_ - I - ‘
_ 2.2. The mutual release set forth in §#1_5`of-the Settlement Agreement does not, S
` . and was never intended to, release, waive, or otherwise affect any claims -
1 any of the Parties have assened,.or may assert, againstany ofthe Nelcela ._
_' V Defendants. ` , ` · i i . ` ._ ‘ __._ 1 _
3..»; `OTHZERCOVENANTS · l_ it . _- i.` ` ` _ '_ fj
ig 3.1; This Addendum supplements and_ clarifies the Settlement Agreement. All _. ‘
E provisions of the Settlement Agreement remain in effect, as clarified in this _ _
Addendum. - __ · _ _ · · - i - ‘ i U _ j
Case 2:O2—cv—O1954-IVIHIVI Document 355-2 Filed O4/O7/2006 Page 2 of 3

3.2. This Addendumcanbeexecutedin any-number of counterparts, each of _
L which shall be an original but all of which together shall constitute but one
‘ instrument. This Addendum can be executed by facsimile signature, · .
provided original signatures aredeliwgered to the Parties} counsel within I0. ‘ , ._
calendar days- of the date of executions - ' . · ` I . -
s T¤<€L¢¥¤=¤sP@s==__ Q fi d TMPQST Feiss 3 .. 4’”. · · ·
Byl n "B " '· . *By _ . . ' ‘ . ·· "
nailed; mms M ,2oos `. Dam: March ,2006 nl " · . ’ Q
W _ _._‘é U . - . · [ _ l. 3
-By§ 4/{Z/"’· . i s -_ - ~ l —
Dat}: March l ,2096 -’ ` I ~ ‘ ` ' · ll l _ il l` ` . A
·I . > , 2 2, ' l` I V · · .. > l ~ l - I I
Case 2:02-cv-01954-IVIHIVI Document 355-2 Filed O4/O7/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 355-2

Filed 04/07/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 355-2

Filed 04/07/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 355-2

Filed 04/07/2006

Page 3 of 3