vs.
Nelcela, Inc., an Arizona Corporation;
Len Campagna, an Arizona Resident;
Alec Dollarhide, an Arizona Resident;
Ebocom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation;
POST Integrations, Inc., an Illinois Corporation
>¤< * >¤= *
And related cross and third-party claims.
CIV 02-1954-PHX-MHM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS CONTROVERTING NELCELA’S
OMNIBUS STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ALL MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND »
POST, LEXCEL, AND MTSI PARTIES’ STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF
CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO NELCELA’S MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EXHIBIT 51
February 17, 2006 letter to Bridget Bade from Veronica Manolio
1668808.1
Case 2:02-cv—O1954-I\/IHI\/I Document 352-71 Filed O4/O5/2006 Page 1 of 3
Sent B : RONAN & FIR · .
M y ESTONE, 602307910G, 17 Feb'06 14:30; Job 99; Page 1/2
8
Q
rlI'E$I(Il\E
I’lJ[
9lIIlllI.It`l ~I>‘· â€
Sum urn mt t'IVt. AIIIIIIIGYS BNI, °°"“5’I¤m \,/m·myig;r |,_ Mtmulin
Suksdglev AL E;5160 _Y_l`llj]l`I(llll)'Il*lLlllIl|`I:·_Il_[CH\()l]g.t.'t')Il\
480 222 s>t00 • rm 480 222-'·)Itl(¤
www.rozmn-l`irost0uu.eulii
l*`t:h.ruut‘y I7, 2006
l·’T{I_fd€`.Â¥il11â€B only (602) 257-5299
Bridget S. Battle
Htoptot; &. .Iolms;o11, LLP
201 l;e2. Wrtsliington Street. Suite I600
Phoenix. AZ. t<$0l)·
(FIV 024954 PHX MHM
Dt;:t·il‘ I-$l'ltlgL‘t;
I nm i1‘1r·•:t:oipt0lYyutrr‘I·`ehru;try I5. 2006 correspondence. As you can iutz*1giue,we ttretlcep
in the throes of tinaliziug our motions for summary judgment in this matuzr, and that is why it has
token. me low nluys to get buck to ytitl.
I do riot want to get into rt dispute with you OV€1'U(>llV€l'SE3lZl0l\S tor Wltltilt I WHS uot present.
and I wats elorrrly not present nt the Outolycr deposition of Pete Kubitz where _yUt.1St1Y Mr, Wul lworlt
told I\/lr. I~`ircstonu of his intention to amend tho Lexccl SLJlLIlit`l|lS,ll1C.L$UIIl]Ti{.1ll‘ll. I will tell you that
I hnve now talked to Mr. l~`It‘oSt0t1C Lltltl llutt hc does not I't‘L‘l'lTCl'l'lbtJ1' the conversation in the manner
you huvtc tleseribetl. 1 was present lor the October discovery lionring where you claim Mr. Wrtllworlt
inlormecl the Coun of his intention to zunond. Again. I do not believe thc convtwsntioo went that
way. l\/ly memory is that I informetl the Court I wus awaiting those “LlOCI.Ili1L7Ill'S†that were supposetl
to prove how Loxoel Solutions, Inc. had acquired the soltwzrre or claims from Lescol, Inc. and that
M r. Wullwork simply tolril the Court he would work with me. Ido not rernembor him ever iolorminl_;
the (__ilI`tl.Il`l that you were planning to tttttcnd your compluirtt.
Britlget, I thii1I·; this might just be one ol" those insmoc-es whcrrz: we will lun/tc to agree tu
tiisugrete. Although I appreciate your oruiccssitm tliut Lexcel Solutions, [nc. is an improper party in
this cose, I rsuonot agree to stipulate to dismiss lexocl Solutions. Inc. ur1tIjust‘“rtd<.I" Loxccl, Inc. in
its steutl. the better uppronclt is that you should voluutmily dismiss I excel Soltu ions` claims under
Rule rll now that you have actual lcnowleclge that it is no ioeorreet party. We may also have to
tlistrgnce whether tho proper ttetiuns were tulttzn onee it was e.liscovere<.I that Iexcel Solutions, Inc.
was not tht: proper putty iu this lawsuit.
Case 2: 2- - - -
0 cv 01954 IVIHI\/I Document 352-71 Filed 04/05/2006 Page 2 of 3
Sent By: RONAN & FIRESTONE; 6023079106; 17 FGDIOG 14:31; JOD 99; Page 2/2
Bridget S. Holla:
i`i:1>i‘i1:1ry 17. 2006
Page 2
l nm hopeful than when you receive our Motion liar fziumimmry Judgiuienr, your client will
angler: to disllllss amy mid all C-luirns by hoth Lcxwl uulities.
l` would be more than happy lu discuss this inzillcr with you in l'urlhi;-r detail either in person
or lclcphouicnlly. Needless lo say. we just ilieagree on the ermi(s1) made cmd how to handle il.
Alllimigli l uppfcciailu you tulcillg the time to write to me and to explain that the wrong party was
named. l cumiut agree to the stipulation you have ollbred. l again urge: you to rethink your c|icnts`
puriiieipnrion in this cause and xml: them lo disiiniss their eliiiins immediately.
ll` you have amy Ul.lIUl` qilezlsilons or CUllLYCl'l`IS, please Llu not hesitate to Cuulzlci me.
Siuccecrely,
‘ Dictuled Hut Not Ruud
Vcroniczl l.. Mzmollo
yl.M;di·
Case 2:02-cv-01954-IVIHIVI Document 352-71 Filed O4/O5/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM
Document 352-71
Filed 04/05/2006
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM
Document 352-71
Filed 04/05/2006
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM
Document 352-71
Filed 04/05/2006
Page 3 of 3
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms