Free Statement - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 92.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 586 Words, 4,089 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/23739/352-67.pdf

Download Statement - District Court of Arizona ( 92.4 kB)


Preview Statement - District Court of Arizona
Merchant Transaction Systems, Inc.
vs.
N elcela, Inc., an Arizona Corporation;
Len Campagna, an Arizona Resident;
Alec Dollarhide, an Arizona Resident;
Ebocom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation;
POST Integrations, Inc., an Illinois Corporation
>¤< * »¤< >¤<
And related cross and third-party claims.
CIV 02-1954-PHX—MHM
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS CONTROVERTING NELCELA’S
OMNIBUS STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ALL MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND
POST, LEXCEL, AND MTSI PARTIES’ STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF
CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO NELCELA’S MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EXHIBIT 47
May 12, 1999 letter from Danielle Dugan to Donald Lenkszus
1668808.1
Case 2:02-cv-01954-IVIHIVI Document 352-67 Filed O4/O5/2006 Page 1 of 3

, enum-02-99 ozeoop I E I —I · *°·‘°1 r.
’/"U .- _. I _ t .. I -
Immz wt ' · ° I .·
_vIA:CERTlI·`IED MAIL- I
RECEIPT REQtJE$Tt1p —
. A I — AND VIA BJJGULAIL Mrs. MAIL I I
Mr. Donald ,l_. ‘
t Tw0`Nmth Central Ave.,.`Ste. 2209 .
. Phoenix AZ 85004-4405
Re: Settlement Agreement dated July I. l995 Lexcel, inc. and CCS
Dear Mr. l ,ert_k;_;us; . _ V
l ll We have yourlejtter dated March Jl, .1999. We are only vaguelylaware of
— Leieel tirid sonie ofthe prior business dealings they had with Credit Card Services (CCS)
while Clmrlie Andersorg wasemployed I ‘
We huve prepared the lbllowng responses to thc questt`ons.mjsed 1;; your loner.
t I .
1. Wo have squrecéodcr All
I E I _
‘t.‘ I
I
2. No cltangeslwrere ever mode to the Lezteel sourec code. ln —faot,_ we did not even know e
we hw WY l·¢’*°¤l $°m¤»¢¤d¢ in WY u¤til»Alcc searched-oworchives lm -
week rand found: the ogigigxtl source oode; Sinoe wc have no use Ihr the source I '
.e·»
3. Although yourlenerjstates i—rrthe·iirst rxaratgruphthrrta-copy ofthedtily l, `l995
I ggreenrem was attached, none was ftunishedii I - _ I -
4. We areeurious about the statement that *‘Lexoelileanted-that CCS to utilize
smartcards for one or more customers"; CCS doesnot have any plans to market tt
smart card at this tinge. l
5- W¢ ¢¢·zG¤¤ its new., i·¤>$¤=l ~M¤~¤=¤¤¤rs4·ss¤¤ewt1»¢¤¢¤*
=*t¢*'¥*€ Tw
rmt me itrysuéhtséihrzte www will Mhavesnever
6. We know ofrso site sublicenscs, licenses t0_single~h¤nl< uscrs, or mu-|ti·bonk .
users of Lexcel software. _ _
Z We have never used, possessed or disclosed Lexeel trade seeret infonnation. We V
have neycr modified or to any "Lexcel software. l
P-0. ¤¤¤ 14606 • Iwine, Qetttomto 92.623 » Office: (714) 7S2·6571 · mx: (714) 752~6976
. EM
Case 2:02-cv-01954-IVIHIVI Document 352567 Ftled 04/ Ol 3

I V , ;Jurn:O2-Q?9 O2 {OOP A I ·- j " P°O2 ··
» Luce! Letter
hg; Typ 3 - _
8- 9é¥l¤f¤i¤¢?¥¤Wv¤V¢¢ 3 e
furziiiixéi scncméénaaéwrntmsalexyéigymecepéuarhidgé. . · . _ ‘ ’
lt is pmjh0p¢,Mr. y9u:c1i¢.n{`i;g;xiug.i¤good_f4ith nndxhgt » 5
r¤¤e¤»¤#¤s¢¤ ?*#r¤¤¤*¤¢*¤S *5 3
pursuiwfmi; mmm utk; 6Fthc4fqr¢:¤11:¤;iq1;¢4f¤cts·wo¤id bmjougidgmd,
frivolous, wc trusxycuwiii cciisider ghisnixgifcrxéioscii ` ` _ 3 " — ` _ "
Sincerely, , _ 3
fi. 'L, r SI *.,1 · 7 ` V V
lg} _ K. ,4,,*; L1.- ···_,;},=_ »'=· · ` ` _ n L i
Vice: Prsidcm md ChiéfO[5é¤iiing OH'1ccr‘
3 DAB/c ` V
3 ) f
Case 2:02-cv-01954-IVIHIVI Document 352-67 Filed O4/O5/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 352-67

Filed 04/05/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 352-67

Filed 04/05/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 352-67

Filed 04/05/2006

Page 3 of 3