Free Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I LAW OFFICES
RONAN & Fnutsromz, PLC
2 9300 E, RAINTREE DRIVE, SUITE 120
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85260 I
3 (480) 222-9100
Merrick B. Firestone, SB #012138
4 Veronica L. Manolio, SB #020230 I
Atmrneysfor the Nelcela Defendants .
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1
7 IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 1 .
8 Merchant Transaction Systems, Inc., No. I 02-CV—1954 - PHX-MHM
9 rraintirs A »
10 vs. I NELCELA, INC., LEN CAMPAGNA j
rl AND ALEC DOLLARHIDE’S
H I Nelcela, Inc., an Arizona corporation; MOTION FOR LEAVE ·
Len Canipawa, an Arizona resident; T0 EXCEED PAGE LIMIT I
12 Alec Dollarhide, an Arizona resident; ON REPLY REGARDING
. Ebocom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; SUMMARY JUDGMENT
13 POST Integrations, Inc., an Illinois Corp.,
14 Dcfcndanm (The Honrable Mary H. Murgia)
15 And Related Counterclaims and Cross-Claims.
1 6 Nelcela, Inc., Len Campagna and Alec Dollarhide (collectively "Nelcela") hereby respectfully
17 request leave of this Court to tile a collective Reply that exceeds the 11-page limit mandated by
18 Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(e). 1
19 Nelcela originally tiled three (3) separate motions for partial summary judgment against I
20 Lexcel, Inc. and Lexcel Solutions, Inc. (“Lexcel"), Post Integrations, Inc., Mary Gerdts and Douglas
21 McKinney ("Post") and Merchant Transaction Systems, Inc, Gene and Tone Clothier ("MTSl").
22 (Docket at 323-325.) Lexcel, Post and MTSI jointly responded in one response. (Docket at 351.)
23 For convenience to the Court and all parties, Nelcela wishes to reply only once to the joint Response
24 in a consolidated Reply and respectfully asks for permission to tile its Reply in excess ofthe 1 1-page
25 limit in Rule 7.2(e). Nelcela agrees not to exceed the thirty-three (33) pages itwould be permitted
26 1 to use should it tile 3 separate Replies and will streamline the Reply as best as it possibly can.
Case 2:02—cv—01954-IVIHIVI Document 356 Filed O4/17/2006 Page 1 of 2 1

1 This motion is made in good faith and solely for the purpose of efficiency and ease to the
2 Court and all parties. A proposed form of Order is filed herewith.
3 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 17“‘ day of April, 2006.
4 ,
RONAN & FIREST0 PLC . ;
5 r /” .r»* ’ { S fl T0 _
tg y , r y' L
,, . N I4.; { { .
6 r
7 Merrick B. Firesto e Mmmm i`Vi y i
Veronica L. Manolio
83 9300 E. Raintree Drive, Suite 120
_ Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
9 ` Attorneys for the Nelcela Defendants
10 ORIGINAL filed electronically with the Clerk’s Office
and COPIES electronically transmitted to the following
ll CM/ECF registrants this same date to: A
12 Lyndon B. Steimel i
lvndon @steimellaw.com
13 Local Counsel for Merchant Transaction Systems ·
14 William McKinnon T
rnailgcoxvilliamnickinnon.com ;
15 Attorney for Merchant Transaction Systems
16 Peter D. Baird I
py [email protected] lrlawcom
17 Robert H. McKirgan _
[email protected]»#.com r
18 Richard A. Halloran A
Rhalloran _ lflawcorn
19 Kimberly Demarchi
Kdemarchi @lrlaw.com I
20 Attorneys for POST and Ebocom r
21 Nicholas J. Wallwork A
nwallwork caste toe.com ;
22 Fredric D. Bellamy .
fhellarny*(a)s;e_ptoe.com I
23 Bridget S. Bade
bbade@ste toe.c r
I 24 Attorneys for Lexcel, Inc.
25 ‘o·3 ... .. {7 i
26 By;%%l&¤t~.iL, { stplerrijs
Case 2:02—cv—01954-IVIHIVI Document 356 Filed O4/17/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 356

Filed 04/17/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Document 356

Filed 04/17/2006

Page 2 of 2