Free Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNUM/PROVIDENT CORP., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM Document 268 Filed 01/12/2006 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brett D. LEAVEY, Plaintiff, vs.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CIV 02-2281-PHX-SMM ORDER

Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Exceed Page Limit and the parties' Stipulation Re Extension of Time to File Reply in Support of Post-Trial Motions and Response to Attorneys' Fee Application. [Doc. Nos. 266, 267] For good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the parties' Stipulation Re Extension of Time to File Reply in Support of Post-Trial Motions and Response to Attorneys' Fee Application [Doc. No. 267] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have until February 3, 2006 to file their Reply in Support of Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, In the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or Remittitur. No further extensions will be granted. // //

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Exceed Page Limit [Doc. No. 266] is GRANTED. Defendants' Reply may be up to 16 pages in length.

DATED this 12th day of January, 2006.

-2Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM Document 268 Filed 01/12/2006 Page 2 of 2