Free Memorandum - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

DECLARATION
I, Steven C. Dawson, states as follows:
BACKGROUND
1. That I am one of the attomeys who represented Joanne Ceimo in this
case.
2. I have been licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona since May of
1981. During that year I began performing trial work in criminal law.
3. In January of 1983 I began a civil practice with Calvin Thur which I
continued until 1995. The primary emphasis of this practice was insurance bad faith
litigation and I had the responsibility for the trial work of the firm.
4. In 1995 Anita Rosenthal and I began our own law firm and our practice
continued to focus on insurance coverage and insurance bad faith litigation. I have
tried over 30 cases to verdict and approximately 25 of these have been representing the
plaintiff in insurance bad faith actions. During the 22 years that my practice has
focused on insurance bad faith litigation, I have also had extensive involvement on the
appellate level.
5. In addition to Arizona, I have represented clients in disputes with their
insurance company in Florida, New Mexico, Indiana and Connecticut and have
consulted with lawyers around the country on insurance bad faith matters. I have been
asked to speak on these topics at various CLE seminars in and out of the state of
Arizona.
Case 2:02-cv-02281—SIVIIVI Document 263-4 Filed 12/22/2005 Page 1 of 3

6. Barbara Leslie has been a paralegal for approximately 20 years and
worked with Dawson & Rosenthal from 1995 until October of 2004. Carla Parkes has
been with Dawson & Rosenthal since 1997 and has been a certified legal assistant
since 2002.
REASONABLENESS OF RATE
7. Our firm has a written contingency fee agreement with the plaintiff in
this action which calls for contingent fees of 40% of recovery and 45% if the matter
goes up on appeal after trial.
8. Plaintiffs counsel advanced all of the litigation expenses.
9. The amount of the contingency fee was established as a result of my
familiarity with the contingency fees charged by other lawyers in Arizona and around
the country that specialize in this area of the law. For example, based upon my
experience with other law firms, I know that contingency fees of 45% of extra
contractual damages, including punitive damages, are common.
REASONABLENESS OF TIME SPENT AND EXPENSES INCURRED
10. I have reviewed the itemization of tasks performed on this case and the
estimates of time spent in performance of those tasks and believe both to be
reasonable. The estimate of time spent is very conservative as much of the work done
on this case could not be recaptured for the purpose of assigning estimates of time. An
itemized listing of work performed on the case by plaintiffs attorneys and paralegals
and estimates of time are attached hereto.
Case 2:02—cv—02281—SI\/II\/I Document 263-4 Filed 12/22/2005 Page 2 of 3

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated this 22"d day of December, 2005.
Steven C. Daéson QL %
Case 2:02—cv—02281—SI\/II\/I Document 263-4 Filed 12/22/2005 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM

Document 263-4

Filed 12/22/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM

Document 263-4

Filed 12/22/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM

Document 263-4

Filed 12/22/2005

Page 3 of 3