Free Stipulation - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 34.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 550 Words, 3,486 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/24041/267.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Arizona ( 34.7 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4429 Facsimile (602) 262-5747 Telephone (602) 262-5311 Stephen M. Bressler (State Bar No. 009032) [email protected] Ann-Martha Andrews (State Bar No. 012616) [email protected] Scott Bennett (State Bar No. 022350) [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants UnumProvident Corporation and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) UNUMProvident Corporation and Provident ) ) Life and Accident Insurance Company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) The parties hereby stipulate that: (1) The defendants may have an extension of time, up to and including February 3, No. CIV-02-2281-PHX-SMM STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF POST-TRIAL MOTIONS and RESPONSE TO ATTORNEYS' FEE APPLICATION (Second Request)

9 Brett D. Leavey, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 2006, in which to file their Reply in Support of Renewed Motion for Judgment as a 19 Matter of Law or, In the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or Remittitur. The 20 current date for filing a response is January 20, 2006, so this stipulation enlarges the 21 response time by two weeks. As the parties had previously stipulated to modify the 22 briefing schedule, this may be considered the second extension of this deadline. The 23 defendants requested the extension, and the plaintiffs agreed, to accommodate defense 24 counsels' schedule and workload. 25 (2) The defendants may have an extension of time, up to and including February 3,

26 2006, in which to file their Response to the Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and 27 Authorities in Support of Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Related Non-Taxable 28 Expenses. As the parties had previously stipulated to modify the briefing schedule, this
Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM Document 267 Filed 01/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
1701995.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

may be considered the second extension of this deadline. The defendants requested the extension, and the plaintiffs agreed, to accommodate defense counsels' schedule and workload. DATED: January 11, 2006 DAWSON & ROSENTHAL LEWIS AND ROCA LLP

By __s/Steven C. Dawson Steven C. Dawson Anita Rosenthal and GREG H. TEMPLE, P.C. Gregg H. Temple and OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. Thomas L. Hudson Danielle D. Janitch Attorneys for Plaintiff

s/Ann-Martha Andrews Stephen M. Bressler Ann-Martha Andrews Scott M. Bennett Attorneys for Defendants Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company and UnumProvident Corporation

By

Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM

Document 267 2 Filed 01/11/2006

Page 2 of 3

1701995.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on January 11, 2006, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Steven C. Dawson Anita Rosenthal Dawson & Rosenthal 6586 Highway 179 Suite B-2 Sedona, Arizona 86351 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregg H. Temple Gregg H. Temple, P.C. 4835 East Cactus Road Suite 225 Phoenix, Arizona 85254-4196 Attorneys for Plaintiff Thomas L. Hudson Danielle D. Janitch Osborn Maledon, P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue Suite 2100 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2794 Attorneys for Plaintiff

s/Roxann Draper

Document 267 3 Filed 01/11/2006

Page 3 of 3

1701995.1