Free Terminate Deadlines and Hearings - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 12.6 kB
Pages: 1
Date: August 2, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 433 Words, 2,752 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/24372/101.pdf

Download Terminate Deadlines and Hearings - District Court of Arizona ( 12.6 kB)


Preview Terminate Deadlines and Hearings - District Court of Arizona
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA CIVIL MINUTES

Phoenix Division CIV 02- 2639- PHX- SRB Year Case No. HON: SUSAN R. BOLTON Nicholas Alozie Plaintiff(s) Deputy Clerk: Maureen Williams DATE: 8-1-05

Judge # 7026 v. Mills Corporation, et al. Defendant(s) Crt Rptr/ECR Kim Moll

Shelton Freeman, Michael Cordier and Lisa Smith (telephonically) Sabinus Mega Plaintiff(s) counsel Defense counsel ============================================================================= PROCEEDINGS: X Open Court Chambers SEALED This is the time set for Pretrial Conference. Motions in Limine discussed. For reasons as stated on the record, the Court rules as follows: Pla's Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of All Evidence Regarding a Shooting Incident [doc. 67] is granted; Pla's Motion in Limine re: Exclude Evidence of Late Filing of Pla's Income Tax Returns [doc. 68] is denied; Pla's Motion in Limine re: Exclude Evidence of Other Lawsuits [doc. 69] is granted in part and denied in part; Pla's Motion in Limine re: Exclude or Limit Expert Opinion Report and Anticipated Testimony of Dfts' Expert Paul R. Bjorklund [doc. 70] is denied as moot; Dfts' Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of Testimony by Pla Dr. Alozie and Others Based on Lack of Personal Knowledge and Hearsay [doc. 71] is denied; Dfts' Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of Any Testimony Regarding Damage to Stored Inventory [doc. 72] is granted; Dfts' Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of Damages Opinion by Retail Leasing Rebuttal Expert Witness [doc. 73] is granted; Dft's Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of Testimony by Pla Dr. Alozie and the Introduction of Any Other Evidence Regarding Certain Alleged Categories of Compensatory Damages [doc. 74] is granted to the extent it has not been previously disclosed; Dft's Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of Unsupported Compensatory Damages by Pla's Expert Damages Witness [doc. 75] is granted; Dft's Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of Any Testimony or Evidence Regarding Punitive Damages [doc. 76] is denied; Dft's Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of Expert Testimony by Pla Dr. Alozie as Fact Witness [doc. 77] is denied; Dft's Motion in Limine re: Exclusion of Expert Testimony by Fact Witness [doc. 78] is denied; Pla's Motion in Limine re: Exclude Expert Opinion Report and Anticipated Testimony of Dft's Expert Brent C. Habakangas [doc. 79] is granted in part and denied in part. Trial schedule discussed. The Court advises the days in trial are 8/9/05, 8/10/05 (a.m. only), 8/16/05 through 8/19/05. Joint statement of the case discussed. Counsel stipulate to a jury of 8. A copy of the exhibit marking instructions is provided to counsel this date. 58 mins.

Case 2:02-cv-02639-SRB

Document 101

Filed 08/01/2005

Page 1 of 1