Free Judgment - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 64.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 17, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 389 Words, 2,662 Characters
Page Size: 614.4 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/24356/107.pdf

Download Judgment - District Court of Arizona ( 64.0 kB)


Preview Judgment - District Court of Arizona
__ FILED 94 LODGED
___ REcE1\/ED cow
1
JUL 2 7 ZUU5
2 CLERK 0 s ossrmcr COURT
DISTFIICAST OF ARIZONA
3 ····~r‘·r·—**·< ··*·· *‘ h‘‘"‘‘‘‘
4
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
6
Richard Buhl, a married man, No. CIV 02-2623-PHX-JAT
7 3
Plaintiff, I
8
vs. JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF ALTA
9 I HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE
Hollander Distribution Systems, Inc., an COMPANY AGAINST HOLLANDER
10 Illinois corporation, fka Carry Companies; 1 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, INC.
Alta Health & Life Insurance Company, a l
11 Colorado corporation; Thomas Wieringa, i
an individual; John Roes and Jane Roes
12 1-5; John Does and Jane Does 1-5, Black
Corporations 1-5; and White Partnerships 1
13 I-5, 1
14 Defendants. i
15 Hollander Distribution Systems, Inc., an
Illinois corporation, fka Carry Companies, I
16 i
Cross-Claimant/Cross-Defendant, [
17
vs.
18 1
Alta Health & Life Insurance Company, a
19 Colorado corporation,
20 Cross-Defendant/Cross—Claimant. i
21 V
22
Case 2:02-cv-02623-JAT Document 107 Filed 08/17/2005 Page 1 of 2

1 Default having been entered against Cross—Defendant Hollander Distribution
2 Systems, Inc. ("Hollander") on its claim against Cross-Claimant Alta Health & Life
3 Insurance Company ("Alta") and Alta having filed a proper Motion for Default Judgment
4 under Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS ORDERED entering
5 Judgment in favor of Alta against Hollander on Hollander’s Cross-Claim against Alta.
6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED entering Judgment against Hollander in favor of
7 Alta on Alta’s Cross-Claim against Hollander in the amount of $25,000 and an additional
8 $51,000 in reasonable attorneys’ fees.
9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
10 Procedure, that there is no just reason for delay for the entry of this Final Judgment in
1] favor of Alta against Hollander.
12 DONE IN COURT this { C day of August, 2005.
H 0 0
I . Aj
. | , g
14 I · ei or
15 1- nited States District Court Judge
16 ORIGINAL lodged with the Court
and COPY of the foregoing mailed
17 thiLs;Q;)L}`¤day of July, 2005, to:
18 Michael J. Raymond, Esq.
RAYMOND GREER & SASSAMAN, PC
19 3636 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1080
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-1940
20 Aaemeys rm Plaintiff
21
22
Case 2:02-cv-02623-JAT Document 107 2 Filed 08/17/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02623-JAT

Document 107

Filed 08/17/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02623-JAT

Document 107

Filed 08/17/2005

Page 2 of 2