1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
United States of America, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CR 02-454-PHX-ROS ORDER REVOKING SUPERVISED RELEASE
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
Armando Ulyesses Espinoza,
12
Defendant.
13 14
A Superseding Petition to Revoke Supervised Release has been filed and defendant has
15
admitted the allegations that he violated Standard Conditions #1, #3 and #7 of his conditions of
16
supervised release. The Court finds the defendant has violated the terms and conditions of
17
supervised release and has considered the US Sentencing Commission Chapter 7 policy statements
18
as well as the original guideline range. The Court finds Defendant's behavior warrants a sanction
19
outside the provisions of the Chapter 7 policy statements. Accordingly,
20
IT IS THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT THAT defendant's supervised release is
21
REVOKED.
22
IT IS ORDERED committing defendant to the custody of Bureau of Prisons for a term of
23
Twenty-four (24) months, to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in Maricopa County
24
Superior Court Case Number CR2006-113493. No Supervised Release to follow.
25
Defendant advised of right to appeal.
26 27 28
DATED this 12th day of March, 2007.
Case 2:02-cr-00454-ROS
Document 43
Filed 03/19/2007
Page 1 of 1