1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
United States of America, Plaintiff, vs. Armando Ulyesses Espinoza, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CR 02-00454-001-PHX-ROS
ORDER
An initial appearance on the Petition on Supervised Release was held on January 31, 2006. THE COURT FINDS that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and has consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition. THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., that he is neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994).
Case 2:02-cr-00454-ROS
Document 27
Filed 02/02/2006
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 court.
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the
DATED this 1st day of February, 2006.
-2Case 2:02-cr-00454-ROS Document 27 Filed 02/02/2006 Page 2 of 2