Free Notice of Filing Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 70.4 kB
Pages: 6
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,707 Words, 11,559 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/23739/431-2.pdf

Download Notice of Filing Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Arizona ( 70.4 kB)


Preview Notice of Filing Proposed Pretrial Order - District Court of Arizona
EXHIBIT 8 NELCELA'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

Deposition of Rose Ana Iniguez, September 15, 2004 [The Joint Parties object to the admission of any of Ms. Iniguez's testimony as irrelevant and lacking in foundation. Ms. Iniguez is a customer service representative who does not install or maintain computer software and lacks foundation to testify regarding the software at issue in this case. See page 42 lines 7-11, page 42 line 23 ­ page 43 line 1, and page 113 line 9 ­ page 115 line 7.] [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 42 lines 7-11, page 42 line 23 ­ page 43 line 1] page 61, line 25 ­ page 62, line 21 [Objection: read through page 63 line 1 for completeness] page 63, line 20 ­ page 64, line 2 page 64, line 11 ­ 22 page 80, line 23 ­ page 81, line 18 [Objection: foundation] page 101, lines 4 ­ 23 [Objection: read through page 102 line 4 for completeness] [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 113 line 9 - page 115 line 7] page 115, line 13 ­ end page 116 ­ page 118, line 4 Deposition of Charles Anderson, April 5, 2005 page 12, line 18 ­ page 13, line 2 [Objection: relevance] page 24, line 15 ­ page 28, line 20 page 28, line 21 ­ page 29, line 8 [Objection: foundation] page 29, line 9 ­ page 30, line 7 page 30, line 25 ­ page 34, line 4 [Objection (page 31 lines 19-25): relevance; Objection (page 32 lines 5-14, page 32 line 16 ­ page 33 line 1, page 34 lines 2-4): hearsay] page 34, line 13 ­ page 36, line 2 page 36, line 12 ­ page 37, line 6 [Objection: relevance] page 38, lines 3 ­ 12 [Objection: relevance] page 40, line 17 ­ page 45, line 23 [Objection (page 45 lines 18-23): foundation] page 51, line 17 ­ page 54, line 19 [Objection (page 54 lines 2-19): hearsay] page 55, line 15 ­ page 56, line 21 [Objection: foundation] page 57, line 14 ­ page 59, line 24 page 79, line 9 ­ page 80, line 11 [Objection: hearsay, relevance] page 80, line 25 ­ page 81, line 7 [Objection: relevance]
1 Document 431-2

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Filed 01/29/2007

Page 1 of 6

page 82, lines 1-16 [Objection (lines 12-16): foundation] page 83, line 23 ­ page 84, line 19 [Objection (page 84 lines 14-19): foundation] page 87, line 3 ­ page 88, line 22 page 108, lines 11 ­ 21 page 112, line 9 ­ page 113, line 9 [Objection: Rules 1002 and 1003] page 135, lines 7 ­ 18 [Objection: foundation] page 136, lines 1 ­ 21 [Objection: foundation] page 179, lines 1- 23 page 182, line 2 ­ page 185, line 22 page 187, line 13 ­ page 188, line 15 page 208, line 4 ­ page 210, line 7 [Objection: relevance] page 212, line 2 ­ page 213, line 2 [Objection: relevance] page 214, lines 12 ­ 22 page 216, line 8 ­ page 218, line 1 page 237, line 15 ­ page 241, line 6 [Objection (page 239 line 14 ­ page 241 line 6): relevance] page 241, line 18 ­ page 247, line 20 [Objection: relevance] page 248, line 6 ­ page 250, line 1 page 260, lines 7 ­ 18 page 263, line 19 ­ page 264, line 23 [Objection: Rules 1002 and 1003] page 265, line 21 ­ page 266, line 6 [Objection: Rules 1002 and 1003] page 266, line 22 ­ page 267, line 18 [Objection: Rules 1002 and 1003] Deposition of Robert Zeidman, October 10, 2005 page 5, lines 1 ­ 15 [Objection: designation should start at page 4, line 22 to include whole question] page 6, lines 16 ­ 22 [Objection: hearsay; incomplete excerpt (must start at line 12 or line 17)] page 10, lines 6 ­ 10 and 14- 23 page 11, lines 1 ­ 3 [Objection: incomplete excerpt, needs page 10 lines 2425 (the question being answered)] page 12, lines 11 ­ 15 [Objection: relevance] page 14, lines 8 ­ 15 and 18 ­ 20 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 15 lines 12 ­ 22] page 17, lines 17 ­ 23 page 18, lines 23 ­ 25 page 19, lines 5 ­ 8 page 20, lines 1 ­ 6 and 12 ­ 23 [Objection: needs lines 7-11 for completeness page 24, lines 11 ­ 17

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

2 Document 431-2

Filed 01/29/2007

Page 2 of 6

[Joint Parties' counter-designations: page 24 line 18 ­ page 25 line 8, page 27 lines 1-10] page 28, lines 4 ­ 10 and 17- 21 page 31, lines 1- 22 page 32, lines 1 ­ 3 and 22 ­ 25 [Objection: needs lines 4 and 5 for completeness] page 33, lines 1- 25 page 37, lines 10 ­ 15 page 39, lines 3 ­ 25 page 40, lines 1 ­ 21 page 41, lines 10 ­ 25 [Objection: answer ends on line 24; designation should stop there] page 42, line 25 [Objection: needs to start at line 20 for completeness] page 43, lines 1 and 11 ­ 13 [Objection: needs to include lines 7-10 for completeness] page 49, lines 1 ­ 6 page 50, lines 14 ­ 16 page 51, lines 1 ­ 25 page 52, lines 1 ­ 20 page 55, lines 5 ­ 25 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 56 line 1 ­ page 59 line 8, page 64 linr 2- page 665 line 21.] page 68, lines 12 ­ 25 [Objection: needs to include lines 7-11 for completeness] page 69, lines 1 ­ 4 page 71, lines 13 ­ 23 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 71 line 23 ­ page 72 line 7] page 75, lines 17 ­ 25 page 76, lines 1 ­ 13 page 77, lines 1 ­ 12 page 78, lines 1 ­ 14 page 80, lines 11 ­ 22 page 81, lines 9 ­ 25 [Objection (lines 18-24): asks for legal opinion] page 82, lines 1 ­ 4 page 83, lines 2 ­ 24 page 85, lines 14 ­ 23 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 85 line 24 ­ page 86 line 3] page 86, lines 12 ­ 25 page 87, lines 1 ­ 10 page 88, lines 1 ­ 6 [Objection: needs to include page 87 lines 24-25 for completeness] page 91, lines 22 ­ 25 [Objection: needs to include lines 14-21 for completeness]
3 Document 431-2

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Filed 01/29/2007

Page 3 of 6

page 92, lines 1 ­ 7 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 92 line 18 ­ page 93 line 6, page 94 line 17 ­ page 95 line 2] page 95, lines 7 ­ 25 [ Objection: needs to include lines 9-13 for completeness] page 96, lines 1 ­ 10 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 96 lines 11-22] page 97, lines 12 ­ 17 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 99 line 20 ­ page 100 line 1] page 100, lines 2 ­ 8 and 14 ­ 25 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 102 line 25 ­ page 103 line 13] page 105, lines 16 -22 page 106, lines 2 ­ 4 and 16 ­ 21 [Objection: needs to include page 105 line 23 ­ page 106 line 1 for completeness] page 109, lines 8 ­ 25 page 110, lines 1 ­ 8 page 120, lines 1 ­ 5 [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 120 line 6 ­ page 121 line 1] page 123, lines 6 ­ 8 [Objection: relevance] page 125, lines 12 ­ 18 page 127, lines 5 ­ 9 page 129, lines 1 ­ 6 and 19 ­ 25 page 130, lines 1 ­ 7 and 17- 25 page 131, lines 6 ­ 19 [Objection: needs to include page 131 line 20 ­ page 132 line 3 for completeness] page 135, lines 13 ­ 25 [Objection: relevance] page 137, lines 14 ­ 25 [Objection: relevance] page 138, lines 1 ­ 2 [Objection: relevance] page 140, lines 8 ­ 15 and 19 ­ 25 page 141, lines 1 ­ 2 page 142, lines 1- 25 [Objection: answer ends at line 23; designation should stop there] page 148, lines 10 ­ 12 [Objection: need to include lines 5-9 for completeness, relevance] page 149, lines 1 ­ 6 page 152, lines 24 ­ 25 page 153, lines 1- 2 and 7 ­ 17 page 154, lines 1 ­ 6 page 157, lines 7 ­ 25 [Objection: include lines 4-6 for completeness] page 158, lines 1 ­ 25 page 159, lines 1 ­ 11 page 161 through page 174 page 175, lines 1 ­ 5
4 Document 431-2

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Filed 01/29/2007

Page 4 of 6

[Joint Parties' counter-designations: page 175 line 12 ­ page 176 line 20; page 177 lines 3-9; page 179 line 10 ­ page 180 line 5; page 187 line 20 ­ page 189 line 5; page 190 lines 7-24; page 191 line 24 ­ page 192 line 10; page 192 line 25 ­ page 193 line 14; page 216 line 9 ­ page 218 line 19,; page 219 lines 2 ­ 15; page 220 line 20 ­ page 221 line 13] Deposition of David Posner, October 4, 2005 page 10, lines 3-6 [Objection: relevance]; line 10- page 11, line 8 [Objection: should start at page 10 line 11 and end at page 11 line 18 for completeness] page 12, line 21 ­ page 14, line 21 [Objection: should end at page 14 line 22 for completeness] page 17, - page 19, line 12 [Objection: need page 19 line 13 through page 21 line 10 for completeness] [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 19 line 13- page 21 line 10] page 21, lines 11 ­ 18 [Objection: need lines 19-21 for completeness] [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 22 lines 8 ­ 25] [Joint Parties' counter-designations: page 23 line 6 ­ page 26 line 21; page 27 line 4 ­ page 28 line 2; page 36 line 8 ­ page 39 line 13; page 42 line 10 ­ page 45 line 6; page 46 line 18 ­ page 47 line 16; page 48 lines 10 ­ 24; page 49 line 19 ­ page 52 line 6; page 57 line 20 ­ page 59 line 1; page 62 line 19 ­ page 63 line 4; page 66 line 10 ­ page 68 line 19; page 75 line 24 ­ page 76 line 15] page 76, line 24 ­ page 77, line 19 page 92, lines 8 ­ 25 [Objection: relevance] page 93, line 18 ­ page 96, line 7 [Objection: need page 96 lines 8-11 for completeness] page 96, line 12 ­ page 97, line 24 page 98, line 12 ­ page 99, line 5 page 102, line 19 ­ page 106 (all) [Joint Parties' counter-designations: page 109 lines 15 ­ 25] page 113, line 6 ­ page 127, line 1 [Objection (page 117 line 15 ­ page 119 line 13): assumes facts not in evidence] page 127, line 16 ­ page 128 (all) page 143, lines 1 ­ 16 page 144, lines 6 ­ 25 page 148, lines 8 ­ 13 page 151, lines 17 ­ 19 page 152, lines 2 ­ 25 page 153, lines 1 ­ 16 page 155, lines 1 ­ 8 page 156, lines 12 ­ 25 page 157, lines 1 ­ 16
5 Document 431-2

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

Filed 01/29/2007

Page 5 of 6

page 160, lines 4 ­ 16 [Objection: relevance, hearsay] page 167 through page 169 [Objection: relevance, should start on page 167 line 2 for completeness] [Joint Parties' counter-designation: page 170 line 1 ­ page 171 line 11] page 171, lines 21 ­ 25 page 172 through page 173 [Objection: should include through page 174 line 4 for complete answer] page 175 through page 176 [Objection: should start on page 174 line 21 for completeness] page 177 through page 182 page 183, lines 1 ­ 4 page 188, lines 1 ­ 4 [Objection: should end on line 5 for completeness] page 190 through page 191 [Objection: should be from page 190 line 3 through page 191 line 23 to include only complete questions and answers] page 193, lines 1- 25 [Objection: should end at line 24 at end of answer] page 195, lines 1 ­ 5 [Objection: should end at line 13 for completeness, relevance] page 198, lines 7 ­ 19 [Objection: should include lines 20-25 for completeness] page 199, lines 1 ­ 23 [Objection: should end at page 200 line 2 for completeness] page 203, lines 2 ­ 25 [Objection: should include page 202 line 23 ­ page 204 line 21 for completeness] page 205, lines 15 ­ 21 and line 25 [Objection: should include lines 22-24 for completeness] page 206, lines 1 ­ 5 page 219, lines 6 ­ 25 page 220, lines 1 ­ 25 page 224, lines 1- 25 [Joint Parties' counter-designations: page 227 line 3 ­ page 228 line 25; page 251 line 7 ­ page 252 line 16] The Joint Parties did not receive the Nelcela Parties' deposition designations until January 19, 2007. Because the delay was not intentional and not meant to delay the Joint Parties in making objections, the Parties had agreed that the Joint Parties could supplement the previously-filed deposition designations to include objections. This Exhibit is intended to incorporate the Joint Parties objections and counter-designations into the prior Exhibit 8 filed with the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order. Nelcela agrees that these objections are timely and should be included.

Case 2:02-cv-01954-MHM

6 Document 431-2

Filed 01/29/2007

Page 6 of 6