Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT l
JAMES W. FIELD, No. 0.6-16389 2 I l
‘ D.C. No. CV—03-02214-SRB .
Plaintiff - Appellant, ‘
and
JUDGMENT
SUSAN F. FIELD, A -
Plaintiff, .
v.
h BRAD WEEKLEY; et al., r '
Defendants, .
and l
DOUG MCDONALD; et al.,
Defendants — Appellees. _
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix). _
On consideration whereof it is now here ordered and adjudged by this P
Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and hereby is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.
A mos <:0Pv
camv A.—cAmsn>s0N
Clerk 0f Court, `~
Anssr .»·1—~· r ‘ ‘· *·~-~¤`;
Filed and entered Wednesday, October 18, 2006 , V U pp “- ..._
‘ UND P!
D _ .·" - ‘ r—-ll? Y
. i -·. *···*
Case 2:03—cv—02214—SFiB Document 273 Filed 11/16/2006 Page‘1of 2

t. L Q {l
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS `
OCT 18 2006
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT cATuxgpE(pL1:%Tg§§.pF1uEAc_•§ERK
JAMES W. FIELD, N0. 06-16389
Plaintiff- Appellant, D.C. No. CV—03-02214-SRB
v. District of Arizona, `
Phoenix
BRAD WEEKLEY; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees. ORDER ,
Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over
this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable.
- See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981) (order
is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties). Consequently,
-- this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
S:\_ProSe\06—l6389.wpd l
Case 2:03-cv-02214-SRB Document 273 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02214-SRB

Document 273

Filed 11/16/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02214-SRB

Document 273

Filed 11/16/2006

Page 2 of 2