Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 76.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 416 Words, 2,684 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35344/119-1.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona ( 76.0 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona
1 REED SMITH LLP
599 Lexington Ave, 29th Floor
2 New York, New York 10022
3 TEL.: (212) 521-5400
FAX: (212) 521-5450
4 Michael Tsang (pro hac vice)
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff General Electric Capital Corporation.
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
(PHOENIX DIVISION)
8 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION )
9 44 Old Ridgebury Road )
Danbury, Connecticut 06801, ) Civil Action No. Cv03—23 l9
1 0 )
Plaintiff, )
1 1 ) STIPULATION FOR
v_ ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO
[L l 2 ) SUBMIT PROPOSED
§ 1 3 GRANT H. GOODMAN AND TER1 GOODMAN. ) FINDINGS DF FACT AND
¤; ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
§ 1 4 Dcf€ndamS_ ) POST-TRIAL BRIEFS, AND
bu, ORAL ARGUMENTS
°° 1 5 (Fifth Request)
1 6 Plaintiff and Defendants by and through their respective counsel move this Court for an
l 7 extension of time to submit their respective Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
1 8
and Post-Trial Briefs in the above-captioned matter. An extension is sought due to ongoing
1 9
discussions between the parties regarding settlement of this action and holiday vacation plans of
2 0
2 1 counsel for the parties.
2 2 Through a prior stipulation between the parties and a subsequent Court Order dated
23 October 28, 2005, the deadline for submission of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
2 4 Law and Post-Trial Briefs is November 30, 2005. The parties were to confer and stipulate to a ~
2 5 date for oral arguments. The parties hereby stipulate and agree to submit their respective post-trial
2 6
submission on or before January 13, 2006. Oral argument shall be heard no less than 30 days
2 7
2 8
- 1 -
Case 2:03-cv—02319-RGS Document 119 Filed 11/23/2005 Page 1 of 2

1 thereafter. The parties further agree and stipulate that Plaintiff s counsel may appear
2 telephonically for oral arguments.
3
4 d ,
Dated this 22“ day of November, 2005.
5
6 REED SMITH LLP
7 A ...1...... ‘— 'd J.
By: f 1,// W 4
8 Michael Tsang pro h c vice)
Joseph O’Neil, Jr. itted » o hac vice)
9 599 Lexington Avenue
1 O New York, New York 10022
(212) 521-5400
1 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff
1 2
5
g 1 3 RENEE GERSTMAN PLLC
§ 1 1 Grant H.
HE 1 5 `§:l:?;zus.11u11;s2;2ao1·0o
l 6 Renee Gerstman
3550 North Central Avenue, Suite 710
1 7 Phoenix, AZ 85016
l 8 Attorney for Defendants
1 9
2 0
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 4 l »»
2 5
2 6
2 7
2 8
- 2 ..
Case 2:03-cv—02319-RGS Document 119 Filed 11/23/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02319-RGS

Document 119

Filed 11/23/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02319-RGS

Document 119

Filed 11/23/2005

Page 2 of 2