Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 193.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 404 Words, 2,587 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35344/111-1.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona ( 193.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona
1 REED SMITH LLP
599 Lexington Ave, 29th Floor
2 New York, New York 10022
3 TEL.: (212) 521-5400
FAX: (212) 521-5450
4 Michael Tsang (pro hacivice) _
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff General Electric Capital Corporation.
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
(PHOENIX DIVISION)
8 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION )
9 44 Old Ridgebury Road )
Danbury, Connecticut 06801, ) Civil Action No. Cv03-2319
10 )
Plaintiff, )
ll ) STIPULATION FOR
v_ ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO
D- I2 ) SUBMIT PROPOSED
§ 13 GRANT H. GOODMAN AND TER1 GOODMAN. ) FINDINGS DF FACT AND
n; ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
E 14 Dcfcndanm ) POST-TRIAL BRIEFS, AND
Q ORAL ARGUMENTS
°‘ 15 (Second Request)
I6 Plaintiff and Defendants by and through their respective counsel move this Court for an
17 extension of time to submit their respective Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
1 8
and Post-Trial Briefs in the above-captioned matter. An extension is sought due to unanticipated
1 9
conflicts in counsels’ schedules.
2 0
2 1 Through a prior stipulation between the parties, the deadline for submission of Proposed
22 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Post-Trial Briefs is August 19, 2005. The parties
2 3 were to confer and stipulate to a date for oral arguments. The parties hereby stipulate and agree to
24 submit their respective post-trial submission on or before September 30, 2005. Oral arguments
2 5 shall be heard no less than 30 days thereafter. The parties further agree and stipulate that
2 6
Plaintiff s counsel may appear telephonically for oral arguments.
2 7
2 8
- 1 -
Case 2:03-cv—02319-RGS Document 111 Filed 08/17/2005 Page 1 of 2

1 Dated this 16th day of August, 2005.
2
3 REED SMITH LLP
1, ’ J \, K » *‘ ‘
Michael Tsang t ed p 0 hac vice)
5 Joseph O’Neil, Jr. *1 mi pro hac vice)
6 599 Lexington Avenue ‘
New York, New York 10022
7 (212) 521-5400
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff
9 RENEE GERSTMAN PLLC
1 0
ll I _ , W
12 Renee Gerstman V A t - E
:1.. 3550 North Central Avenue, Suite 710
i‘ 13 Phoenix, AZ 85016
l-
S
2 14
E GRANT GOODMAN, PC
M 15
16 { 2 {gaze
17 Grant H. oo1dman
5110 N. 444t Street, L200
18 Phoenix, AZ 85018
1 9 Attorneys for Defendants
2 0
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 4
2 5
2 6
2 7
2 8
.. 2 ...
Case 2:03-cv—02319-RGS Document 111 Filed 08/17/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02319-RGS

Document 111

Filed 08/17/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02319-RGS

Document 111

Filed 08/17/2005

Page 2 of 2