Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 197.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 418 Words, 2,576 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35344/113-1.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona ( 197.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona
1 REED SMITH LLP
599 Lexington Ave, 29th Floor
2 New York, New York 10022
3 TEL.: (212) 521-5400
FAX: (212) 521-5450
4 Michael Tsang (pro hac vice)
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff General Electric Capital Corporation.
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
(PHOENIX DIVISION)
8 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION )
9 44 Old Ridgebury Road )
Danbury, Connecticut 06801, ) Civil Action No. Cv03-2319
10 )
Plaintiff, )
ll ) STIPULATION FOR
v_ ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO
EL I2 ) SUBMIT PROPOSED
F 13 GRANT rr. GOODMAN AND TERI GOODMAN. ) FINDINGS DF FACT AND
E ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
§ 14 Dcfcndanw ) POST-TRIAL BRIEFS, AND
E ORAL ARGUMENTS
°‘ 15 (Third Request)
I6 Plaintiff and Defendants by and through their respective counsel move this Court for an
II extension of time to submit their respective Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
1 8
and Post-Trial Briefs in the above-captioned matter. An extension is sought due to ongoing
1 9
discussions between the parties regarding settlement of this action.
2 0
2 1 Through a prior stipulation between the parties and a subsequent Court Order dated August
2 2 17, 2005, the deadline for submission of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and
23 Post-Trial Briefs is September 30, 2005. The parties were to confer and stipulate to a date for oral
2 4 arguments. The parties hereby stipulate and agree to submit their respective post-trial submission
2 5 on or before October 31, 2005. Oral arguments shall be heard no less than 30 days thereafter. The
2 6
parties further agree and stipulate that Plaintiffs counsel may appear telephonically for oral
2 7
2 8 argumen s
t .
- I ..
Case 2:03-cv—02319-RGS Document 113 Filed 09/21 /2005 Page 1 of 2

1
2 Dated this 21st day of September, 2005.
3
4 REED SMITH LLP
/
6 ichael Tsang/Zéyitted p 0 hac vice)
Joseph O’Neil, ’ fadmi ed pro hac vice)
7 599 Lexington Aven e
New York, New York 10 22
8 (212) 521-5400
9 Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
RENEE GERSTMAN PLLC
11
5 12 MT
E 13 Renee Gerstman
5 3550 North Central Avenue, Suite 710
2 14 Phoenix, AZ 85016
td
¤< 15
GRANT GOODMAN, PC
16
18 Grant H. Goodman
5110 N. 444th Street, L200
19 Phoenix, AZ 85018
2 0 Attorneys for Defendants
2 1
2 2
23
24 U
2 5
2 6
2 7
2 8
.. 2 -
Case 2:03-cv—O2319-RGS Document 113 Filed O9/21/2005 Page 2 012

Case 2:03-cv-02319-RGS

Document 113

Filed 09/21/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02319-RGS

Document 113

Filed 09/21/2005

Page 2 of 2