1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 PAUL WOODCOCK, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 The court has before it defendants' motion for reconsideration and/or new trial (doc. 17 130), plaintiffs' response, and defendants' reply. 18 The court has carefully considered these documents and has also reviewed our order 19 of May 24, 2005. For the reasons stated in that order, IT IS ORDERED DENYING 20 defendants' motion for reconsideration and/or new trial (doc. 130). 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:04-cv-00078-FJM Document 135 Filed 08/25/2005 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
SHIMKO & PISCITELLI, et al., Plaintiffs, vs.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CV-04-78-PHX-FJM ORDER
DATED this 24th day of August, 2005.