PROTECTIVE
ORDER ORDERS
SECTION
P.O.P.
1355/2005
INC.
TRANSLATION
FROM
SPANISH
On
the
twenty-second
the
of
September
two
of
thousand
and motion
five
for the of the
hereby suspension ruling
the
report
to
procedural along Clerk
statu status
with
of the the in
thi this
the
Judge
Court
official
copy
of
sent
by
the
Three-Judge
Court and
Twenty-seventh
and
Circuit
residing
thi this City
telegram
preliminary report reports
registered with 30334
30335 and
number numbers
30289
30355
30229
30045
03052
30406
respectively.
Certified. THE COURT CLERK
Illegible
EDGAR DAVID
signature
CASTRO LARA
Quintana thousand and
five.
Roo
twenty-second
of
September
two
Having
it is
examined send legal
the
aforementioned motion
of for
Court
Clerk Clerks
report
for the
ruled
thi this
effect effects
suspension
letter
corresponding means by mean of
the
official
of the in
number
9390
which
the
Court Clerk
Three-Judge
Court of
Twenty-seventh
Circuit
residing
the
thi this city
copy
of
send sends
the
on
nineteen passed filed
in
page pages
the
of
text
file
official
to
ruling
case
related
complaint
number
130/2005
and
by
the
plaintiff plaintiffs
HARTSLOPE
HOLDING HOLDINGS
LIMITED
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 1 of 10
PROTECTIVE
ORDER ORDERS
SECTION
P.O.P.
1355/2005
INC.
CASAFIN September suspension was
LIMITED two
of
against thousand
the
ruling
in
dated which
the the
ninth
of
and
five
provisional
the
aforementioned
protective
order proceedings proceeding
denied. The complaint
ruling
in
its
sole
point determined
the
following
SOLE
Limited of and
POINT.Casafin
two in
The
complaint
filed
the
by Hartslope Holdings Holding
ruling dated he ninth
the in
Limited thousand
against and
September
Judge
the
five
passed
by
Third
this thi
District
the
State for
of Quintana suspension
is
Roo
residing
to
city
in
motion
related
pro
order proceeding 1355/2005 proceedings With acknowledgement
in of
well-founded.
receipt. with
the
Now
Three-Judge
strict
of
compliance
the
decision residing LIMITED
in
Court
the
Twenty-seventh
Circuit
thi this
city
plaintiff HARTSLOPE plaintiffs
are granted
in the
HOLDING HOLDINGS
and
so
CASAFIN that
LIMITED
provisional
suspension
and
the
thing things
remain 208B
their
current
state
aircraft
Cessna XA-TUF
Caravan and with the
with
serial number
208B0941
registration Augusta
or
Helicopter
Registration XA-TSR
are not disposed
of
lO9E
the
serial number that
116
the
sold
in
understanding
aforementioned property
and
aircraft
in at
will
continue investigation
provisionally
secured
preliminary
the
PGR/SIEDO/UEIOFM/015/2004
disposal
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 2 of 10
PROTECTIVE
ORDER ORDERS
SECTION
P.O.P.
1355/2005
INC.
of
the
authoritie authorities
the respondent
indicated
as
the
respondent notified
of
authoritie authorities
the in
until passed
authoritie authorities
the
are
ruling
regarding
the
definitive
in
suspension prevent
to the
thi this
of
proceeding
foregoing difficult
order to
to
the
causing
damage damages
that
are
the
repair
of the
aforementioned
act. of the
plaintiff plaintiffs
The
with caselaw
of
enforcement sustained by
the
challenged First
the
Division
Supreme Court
of is
Justice
of
Nation
of the
visible Supreme
on page Court
2333
Volume
LXXXVII
to
Fifth Serie Series
the
applicable
case
and
which
verbatim
follow follows
the unquestionable that such but it cannot suspension operate regarding securing the such as the disposal doe does regarding thereof consequence consequences of the secured the authorities authoritie property by respondent it other person and the order to move such to delivering persons derived from such property elsewhere and other consequences consequence if the because such act acts suspension prevents prevent consequences consequence the it is that following securing unquestionable public order is not affected if such object remains remain as secured decide property at the disposal of the case Judge who decides on the aforementioned whilst the issue is crime being in virtue of the fact that the principally processed than provisional securing is nothing more preventive that has the aim of preventing that the measure consequence consequences of the crime are irreparably consummated.
PROVISIONAL SECURING OF IN THE CASE OF.- If SUSPENSION been provisionally secured it
THE
the is
OBJECT
object of
OF
THE CME. the crime has
Similarly
of the
the
caselaw
of
sustained
of
by the
the
First
Division on
Supreme
Court
Justice
Nation
visible
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 3 of 10
PROTECTIVE
ORDER ORDERS
SECTION
P.O.P.
135
5/2005 INC.
page
437
of
Volume
is
LXXXVII
Fifth which
Serie Series
of
the
Supreme
Court Report Reports
applicable
verbatim reads read
as
follow follows
SECURING
THE.the
Even
crime
OBJECT OF THE SUSPENSION OF CRIME when the securing has as its purpose the object of no harm is caused to general interest with the OF THE
property is not disposed of is defined when the basis of the basi legal situation order proceedings is decided that the named proceeding given protective depository will hand over such property to the corresponding person once the issue has been concluded.
suspension until its
granted
so
that
the
Furthermore
of the
the
caselaw
of
sustained
of
by the
First
Division
Supreme
Court
Justice
the
Nation
visibl
page
98
Report Reports
is
applicable
which
verbatim reads read
as
foll
SECURING OF THE
CASE OF. of the The
OBJECT
OF
THE
CRIME
SUSPENSION
the securi is inadmissible against suspension of the because its object crime property will make it difficult which is the to prove disappearance
basi basis
State
of any criminal process given that the society proces in the crime are interested of crimes investigation of the guilty parties. But regarding the punishment of the securing indicated by the plaintiff and which of of the auctioning and awarding definitive suspension is admissible
the
and
the
and the effects effect consist
the the the
secured
good goods
requirement requirements of section Orders Protective Order Act.
II
and
that it meet meets given III of Article 124 of
Through
the
the
official
to
letter
the
sent
to
thi this effect
indicated comply them
inform
as the the
foregoing
decision
authoritie authorities
they
respondent
authoritie authorities
decision
so to
that
may
with
aforementioned
thi this
end
send
duly
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 4 of 10
PROTECTIVE
ORDER ORDERS
SECTION
P.O.P.
1355/2005
iNC.
Certified photocopy
of the
of in
the
relevant
part
of
the court sent
official
of
copy
ruling the
passed
the
aforementioned
the
appeals. the these which Local case
the
On
other
hand
add
telegram
in this thi
by
to of
Telegraph Telegraphs
Administrator
legally
based
city
file files
as
correspond corresponds
informed for
not
thereto
that the
by
mean means
Federal
Court
was
General by
Control the
and
Registration
Director
Property exist
Secured
in the
Attorney
Federal
General Generals
District
so for
Office
which
is
doe does
Mexico report
City
the is
agreed
three
inform of
plaintiff provided
of
that
in
in
term of
day days
II
it of
may state
the
what
Article
297
Section
in
Federal
to
Code the
Civil
Procedure
Order
in the
applied state
of
suppletory legal
manner with
to
Protective
that the
Act
case
their not
defense
defense
to
the
warning
making
any
thi this regard
as
authority authority will be
in
question will
the
cease
appear
re
and
notification posterior notifications
referred
suspended. send
the the to
Finally
submitted Director Property Minister Property
the
thi this
case
file
by
of
Federal Federal
Attorney Agency
to of the
Investigation
Property Sale Head
Legal
Coordinator attached
of
Service
of the of his
the
Treasury
and
Public
Finance
Administration and Sale
Service
Director
to
General him
Property
Administration and Sale
Service
give
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 5 of 10
PROTECTIVE
ORDER ORDERS
SECTION
P.O.P.
1355/2005
iNC.
full in
title and
the
Minister
of
Public
as
Safety
as
all
domiciled
of
Mexico
City Federal District
Attorney
in
well
the in
Delegate this thi
the
Federal
General Generals
Roo his
Office
of full
based
the
city
State
Delegate
Quintana give him
Federal
Attorney
it
General Generals Office
is
to
title
to be
for which listed in
decided
that
such
report reports
are
reserved
the
respective
Let
motion
it be
hearing.
to the
known
partie parties and
personally
to
the
plaintiff.
Thu Thus
ruled
and Judge
signed
in the
by
Mrs. of
Ana
Maria
Nava
Ortega
Mr. and
Third District Edgar
attest.
State Court
Quintana who
Roo
before
David
Castro
TO
Lara
THE
Clerk
authorize authorizes
ATTEST
FOREGOING.
Illegible signature
Illegible
signature
Michele
Pagano
authorized by the with domicile at
Translator duly qualified and Expert Superior Court of Justice in Mexico City Rio Elba 25-K Col. CuauhtØmoc Mexico
and 5286-29-02
to
City D.F.
certify that and belief document
in
Tel.
5286-81-89
Fax
of of
the
foregoing is true and correct
best translation
the
hereby my knowledge the attached
do
Spanish.
Mexico
City Federal District
September
30
2005.
chele
Pagano
PLo
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS Document 119-4 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 6 of 10
nU-2s-20 aztz
LIE
socclON
QE AMPARO AMPAROS
J.A 1355/2005.
En veintidAs di sepembre veintidA
del
aæo doe mu guardo
et
Cinco
present. par
ol
cloy
cuonta
to
Jun
con
ci
el
ostado
procosal
quo
InCkleme
do
$uaponain1
lestimonlo Tribunal
do
rssolucln
remttldc
Seoretwlo de
Col4ado del VigØsimo SØptirno Circulta con resk1Qn1g en ests dudad ii tulegrama est Cos Intonnea pravios. rsgistradca con los nOmerea 30355 3fl 3ai 30046. i0353 30106 30314 40335y 30283 mspactivsmente.Conate
dci
Muotdo Muotdos
ot.
UC.
OAR
do
PAVV
ThO LAfl
Cancthi doe nit cinco.
QulMano Rca
nlnhldO nlnhldOs
aeptiemby aeptiembys
dii
sæo
Visto
to
Inlormado par
ii
Secretarlo
errazn
Inente
de curia gut da suspension
anteced anteceds
paro
cual
el
so acuerda
gkse
preao
eticta etictas legalea pertinsntes pertinsnte Seeretado do con
oMnimero
Tribunal
9390 means.
of
Acu.$qd
Cologiado SI VigOsimo
remito
SØptirno Circulto
idJen
do
to
sate
chided
en ciieclnueve
toja tojas tWoe
relaflvo
reaoiuclOn
teoronto
pronunclada
en
it
boa
at
redtqueJa
nme.D
130/2005
interpuesto
par las
Ue1OSa%4Ai6tOPe
en
HOLDING HOLDINGS
UMIrED
CABAFIN
UMITED
COntI a00erdo
en
ol
di fetha nueve
do septiembre dii aæo doe mIt
las referidsa
quo
so
to
negO
Ia
euspenoln
provisIonal
Jmpetrantee
do garantias. punlo resolutivo dotarminO
La resoludOn do guejo en su
Ic
rilco
siguiente
Omco.- Es
fwadado
oi
rocurso
qua/ qua/s
limited
Mterptaa Mterptaas par
HastaIop HastaIops H0wm95 Limited dl nuave Totter Totters do sepllembn
do
GauNt
en contra del autc
ii
doe ntiS clnco nti
dItado pop
Just
sip
DSrho en
en
it
Estada do
di Ou4Ptana
suapenalØn
R04
con
asS
cot cots
cludad
Incident
retlvti SI MiMic
do
1355X ams 1355XS
Acigge
Phora
rocitic
do
estilo.
bten
on
istricto
ixunpllmkrnth
to
c5etermnacln
omitida
per
ci
Tribunal
Colegiado
dot
VisImo
SØptlmo
Circulto
con
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 7 of 10
lcrYJv_t
kji
Lt P.2
SECCION
OS AMPAMOS AMPAMO
4.. 1368/2006. INC
msldencla en
cludac
so concede CASAFIP1
laS
quosa ARTSLQPE quosas
la
MOLDING MOLDINGS
provisional
UMITED
LIMITED
en
suspensiOn astaOo en quo
Ia
un do quo las casio so manlengan
actualmente se encuantran Caravan
no so dlsponga
anojene
soronave
uossna
2083 con nUmera
taftcAptera
de svle 20680941 matrfcula XA-TSR. mecca
XA
fliP
eat
coma
Matricufo
modem
Augusta lndicadn
A-109E con nmeio do tone
118
en
Ia
lmeilgencf
qua las
QronSVo QronSVos
Is
contlnunÆn en au carOcter
00 bianee tsegumdoa
dentro
do
aveiiguacln
rev1a
PC3PJ$IEDOUEIOFM/015/2004
diapoelc6n do las autorhdadee
tanto
aenalada aenaladas
coma
respansables.
has
en
so notifique scarce do
Las autoridadea
responsablee.
is
resoluclAn
quo se
thorn
Is
suspensiOn
definitive
en
prosente
nciOenc1a
anterior
efocto
do evltar qua so oausen daloe do mcit repwaSOn
lee aludida aludidas
quojosa quojosas con
tfene
ejocuciAr ejocuciArs del
aao reciamado.
Ia
Al
aac
apllcecton
is
tal tals
do
sustentade
par
Primer an
Sala
de
to
Supreme Carte do Judois Judoi
del
Is
PIaci6n
4stbe
Is
pÆgna
do
ma
2333
Tome
LXXXVII
Quinta
paaa
604
8etnanarb
Juololsi
F$doacin
QUO 00 del tenor
literal
elguiente
szaspsl4n no pusde npwar lS2$cto as es 85091/ramlanto 00f0 de sue consacuonma coma son quo so dlscings del alqwesaao oqSw dlscing pot las suladdadas suladdada responsoblea haYunde dl area areas QntnQga personae Ia 81 tta.glsokje oto liigw Come Comes oonacuenol.g qua derherr do 1sf 03 scIon flQUB frnpWe ee seaftos usea fto
At
ASEGUUAMIENTO DEL OBJETO DEL DELITO SUSPENSION TflATANDOsg GE.- 3/ so asegurd el Objl eta dWfto as mdtftMb qua
an
cerdcrey
do
qua no so eSote ci ovdem pObflcr Ce negu.csoo. SspcMj
consec9 paaiops paaiop
al
asomnmjp
nsnol
m1ncai 10CR VSz que pecauto/ quo ren pecauto/s
dMa
dkho obmto csint4nI Cs door Ca La
an
smiaip
no v/one
ql.e
usa
ABeQuamon
c4leto
asijn
sor s/rp
en
Ic
do otI
Igualmente done
e4lp
sp Xfl$uq7fq
un
aplicadØn
teala
Suten0
Nacin
$oa de
par
Ia
PrImers PrImer
a
Suprerna
Cane do Juevcfa
visible
en
to
pAgina
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 8 of 10
dUtlFiJb
u33
DE
flS24S36
SECION
DE AMPARO AMPAROS
J.A.
P.3
1355/2006.
437 del
Tomo
LXXXVII
Quirtla
Epoce
del
Sarnanarlo JudIcial
do
La
Federaoin
quo os del tenor
literal
guiente
tIO$J
ASEOIJRAMIENTQ DEL. OSJETO DEL. Aun tuato asguramlonrC llett pa nots QWBT4 QOfl ---fl/ngUfl pwjuclo so CUSR
DEL
aasm
fin
SUSPENSiON
dot
not
objoto
Si4SPEnEl7 concedida
par pars
---jurIdlc ---jurIdlcs
RO
doWns quo no so clispongs do los b/ones rn/entree rio so doWn Eu si/usc/On clispong b/one robioeve ni tondo ISo was quooidapostraro anp4pc nombraco esos oonssponda. una vet onflgard eso bSrs quien tarrntna.jo olaeunso.
bSr
Asimiento Sale do
cobra
aplicaciOn
La
tsSht
austefltaCa
por
La
Primers Primer
Ia
Supreme
Cone do
Justicla
de
Ia
Nacln
visible
on
Is
pÆgina
985
dot
Trio
XCVU
Qulnta Epoca.
dot
gmarianio
JudicIal
cte
Ia
Pederacln.
qua as del tono
literal
DEL OBlt4EL DELJT4 SUSPENSION ASEGURAMIENTQ EN tACO DL- La susponsldn esjyffcedsnro con of ccumment conS
do Joe b/one b/ones objoro dot do/ftc paibjfl Uewmtsc/flfl dfflcuftvla in del pr/onto qui.c La 6ase do lode pmeasc penal. puosic ccmprobacln ot Ettado fl Jntorado an Is aworuacl6n Jntorados quo to sociodad do
doiitosy
en
Los
amnft
at
cast/go dadps dadp 4fr1rosuiran mwtnsahies dg gJo mwtnsahie olQcto olQctos dot oumnSrnrz oeM/edna pore quojoso
ol
fiat fiats conthtlr on precede
to
jafnjto
yadfi4lcsdOn
sztJiS/Wtha
ylil
do las
do
do lea nwtanofss asogurade nwtanofs asogurades puesto quo eonosnnn los mqsfloe atlao 24 dot Lay do Amparo. dots
fMcto1fI1
Mnte
vPtmtonto
do qua cumplan coplo totostitica
alicia
qua
51
etecto
as
gin gins hÆgKse
Ic
anterior
del
do as autoridades aeæaludes autoridade aeæalude con
come raeponsabln
fin
Ia
indicada
dntcnnlnacln do
pan
to
t51
tIn.
roitlIasele roitlIaseles
debidamento
certifluacia
porte
conducente
del
tostintonto
do resoiudn
dictada
par
el
siudido
Inbunat Ce alzada.
Par atre
porte ttrØguaa.
eatoe auto para qua abc abcs autos
ei
oomo
legalmente corneeponda con
telegroma roruitldo par soda
Adnlnlatrador
Local
do
TelØgratos TelØgrato
en
en
at
cludad
travØ travØs
del
cual
irdorma
ate Juzgado Pederal
ac
qu
Cone DMCW ConeS 8. Contr
exlst
Registro
Aaguramtento
Ic
Mlntotorlale Mlntotorlales no
Olotrito
Foderal
quo
so
acuerda
del
des.
part parts queosa
pare quo
ntro
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 9 of 10
thUE
Q3J
WE
54ESG
rnRWAQQ
BECCIP4
OSAMPARO OSAMPAROS
Ii
an
SaCOON
Ot AMPARQ3
is
iaastwos.
INC.
of
rnlftuk
297
fracclbn
II
daf
S6dgo
Jo
sderaI
Lay
do ProCodimen1Ds ProCodimen1D manlieto
CIvkIe CIvkIes
apUcadc
suplotorlernenta
do
Ampam
to
quo
ott
dorecho
oouosponda
con
at
Dtrtibmlqnto qua do no
pronunciarse
al
reapecto
so dejaiÆdo tenor reforarmia
omo
rosonaabIe
on
sore
asunto
La
auoqIdg
do
so susponder4n
las
poatodor$e
notificoemne notificoemnes per
cs
quo
Aste so
iSleto.
Pnalrnanlo
glsense
usia expedient.
InckWnal.
los
lnrormn do
rendidus pro vici rendidu pQr Fedorot
at
Procurador
General
do
to
Republics. ttutar
Agenda
adscritg
ai
do
tnvesilgacin
000rdInadbr
Jurcdico
de Blanea
Sarvlcic
do EnajenaclOn Os Planes. Secvetatlo do HecIands HecIand
Titular dot Survitfo
Cridfto
Pbllo
do AdminttlUn SOMCIQ
do
Enajonadn
do
Blanee
Dlroclor
Oune OuneS
eu coaecta
MnThotrecltr
Saevstarlo
EnajenaclOn
do
Blefle en Blefles
denomInation
en
do
Soguilood corno
PCsblIca
taCo taCos eon
dccnetIto
Mexico Ce
Dlst$to
Federal
aol
Detegado do
Procurodurla General
to RepCibff
os con
eerie
on sets dudS set Genera do acuerde
autentia
dud
Celogeds otataI Celoged
Aep4bIlea. on
tiu
en Qulniano
denornlrtadn
Ret do
is
ProGuradurla
conecte
dicho dichos
to
quo so
en
reSrvense pars ser reieolonadoe par
Incidental
lnfonn
mspectlvn.
Nolifiquesa
peronstmnt peronstmnts
time
en
to
ta
psd
quejese. Maria
Ml Jun
to
pravsy do
ticenclada
Ma
do
Nave
Orlada
Onto
TarQ
Dletcho
at
Estado
Qulntana
Roe
Itcenefado
Edgar
Davtd
Ca6V1i
Secretarlo
quo
avtortza
do
DcnFE.
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS
Document 119-4
Filed 10/07/2005
Page 10 of 10