Free Other Notice - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 439.7 kB
Pages: 10
Date: October 7, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 2,883 Words, 18,259 Characters
Page Size: 610 x 791 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43288/119-4.pdf

Download Other Notice - District Court of Arizona ( 439.7 kB)


Preview Other Notice - District Court of Arizona
PROTECTIVE

ORDER ORDERS

SECTION

P.O.P.

1355/2005

INC.

TRANSLATION

FROM

SPANISH

On

the

twenty-second
the

of

September

two
of

thousand

and motion

five
for the of the

hereby suspension ruling
the

report
to

procedural along Clerk

statu status
with
of the the in

thi this

the

Judge
Court

official

copy

of

sent

by

the

Three-Judge

Court and

Twenty-seventh
and

Circuit

residing

thi this City

telegram

preliminary report reports

registered with 30334
30335 and

number numbers
30289

30355

30229

30045

03052

30406

respectively.

Certified. THE COURT CLERK

Illegible
EDGAR DAVID

signature
CASTRO LARA

Quintana thousand and
five.

Roo

twenty-second

of

September

two

Having
it is

examined send legal

the

aforementioned motion
of for

Court

Clerk Clerks

report
for the

ruled

thi this
effect effects

suspension
letter

corresponding means by mean of
the

official
of the in

number

9390

which

the

Court Clerk

Three-Judge

Court of

Twenty-seventh

Circuit

residing
the

thi this city
copy
of

send sends
the

on

nineteen passed filed
in

page pages
the

of

text
file

official
to

ruling

case

related

complaint

number

130/2005
and

by

the

plaintiff plaintiffs

HARTSLOPE

HOLDING HOLDINGS

LIMITED

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 1 of 10

PROTECTIVE

ORDER ORDERS

SECTION

P.O.P.

1355/2005

INC.

CASAFIN September suspension was

LIMITED two
of

against thousand

the

ruling
in

dated which

the the

ninth

of

and

five

provisional

the

aforementioned

protective

order proceedings proceeding

denied. The complaint

ruling

in

its

sole

point determined

the

following

SOLE
Limited of and

POINT.Casafin
two in

The

complaint

filed
the

by Hartslope Holdings Holding
ruling dated he ninth
the in

Limited thousand

against and

September
Judge
the

five

passed

by

Third
this thi

District

the

State for

of Quintana suspension
is

Roo

residing
to

city

in

motion

related

pro

order proceeding 1355/2005 proceedings With acknowledgement
in of

well-founded.

receipt. with
the

Now
Three-Judge

strict
of

compliance
the

decision residing LIMITED
in

Court
the

Twenty-seventh

Circuit

thi this

city

plaintiff HARTSLOPE plaintiffs
are granted
in the

HOLDING HOLDINGS

and
so

CASAFIN that

LIMITED

provisional

suspension
and
the

thing things

remain 208B

their

current

state

aircraft

Cessna XA-TUF

Caravan and with the

with

serial number

208B0941

registration Augusta
or

Helicopter

Registration XA-TSR
are not disposed
of

lO9E
the

serial number that

116
the

sold

in

understanding

aforementioned property
and

aircraft
in at

will

continue investigation

provisionally

secured

preliminary
the

PGR/SIEDO/UEIOFM/015/2004

disposal

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 2 of 10

PROTECTIVE

ORDER ORDERS

SECTION

P.O.P.

1355/2005

INC.

of

the

authoritie authorities
the respondent

indicated

as

the

respondent notified
of

authoritie authorities
the in

until passed

authoritie authorities
the

are

ruling

regarding
the

definitive
in

suspension prevent
to the

thi this
of

proceeding

foregoing difficult

order to
to

the

causing

damage damages

that

are
the

repair
of the

aforementioned
act. of the

plaintiff plaintiffs
The

with caselaw
of

enforcement sustained by
the

challenged First

the

Division

Supreme Court
of is

Justice

of

Nation
of the

visible Supreme

on page Court

2333

Volume

LXXXVII
to

Fifth Serie Series
the

applicable

case

and

which

verbatim

follow follows

the unquestionable that such but it cannot suspension operate regarding securing the such as the disposal doe does regarding thereof consequence consequences of the secured the authorities authoritie property by respondent it other person and the order to move such to delivering persons derived from such property elsewhere and other consequences consequence if the because such act acts suspension prevents prevent consequences consequence the it is that following securing unquestionable public order is not affected if such object remains remain as secured decide property at the disposal of the case Judge who decides on the aforementioned whilst the issue is crime being in virtue of the fact that the principally processed than provisional securing is nothing more preventive that has the aim of preventing that the measure consequence consequences of the crime are irreparably consummated.

PROVISIONAL SECURING OF IN THE CASE OF.- If SUSPENSION been provisionally secured it

THE
the is

OBJECT
object of

OF

THE CME. the crime has

Similarly
of the

the

caselaw
of

sustained
of

by the

the

First

Division on

Supreme

Court

Justice

Nation

visible

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 3 of 10

PROTECTIVE

ORDER ORDERS

SECTION

P.O.P.

135

5/2005 INC.

page

437

of

Volume
is

LXXXVII

Fifth which

Serie Series

of

the

Supreme

Court Report Reports

applicable

verbatim reads read

as

follow follows

SECURING
THE.the

Even

crime

OBJECT OF THE SUSPENSION OF CRIME when the securing has as its purpose the object of no harm is caused to general interest with the OF THE

property is not disposed of is defined when the basis of the basi legal situation order proceedings is decided that the named proceeding given protective depository will hand over such property to the corresponding person once the issue has been concluded.
suspension until its

granted

so

that

the

Furthermore
of the

the

caselaw
of

sustained
of

by the

First

Division

Supreme

Court

Justice

the

Nation

visibl

page

98

Report Reports

is

applicable

which

verbatim reads read

as

foll

SECURING OF THE
CASE OF. of the The

OBJECT

OF

THE

CRIME

SUSPENSION

the securi is inadmissible against suspension of the because its object crime property will make it difficult which is the to prove disappearance

basi basis
State

of any criminal process given that the society proces in the crime are interested of crimes investigation of the guilty parties. But regarding the punishment of the securing indicated by the plaintiff and which of of the auctioning and awarding definitive suspension is admissible
the

and

the

and the effects effect consist
the the the

secured

good goods

requirement requirements of section Orders Protective Order Act.

II

and

that it meet meets given III of Article 124 of

Through
the

the

official
to

letter
the

sent

to

thi this effect
indicated comply them

inform
as the the

foregoing

decision

authoritie authorities
they

respondent

authoritie authorities
decision

so to

that

may

with

aforementioned

thi this

end

send

duly

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 4 of 10

PROTECTIVE

ORDER ORDERS

SECTION

P.O.P.

1355/2005

iNC.

Certified photocopy
of the

of in

the

relevant

part

of

the court sent

official
of

copy

ruling the

passed

the

aforementioned
the

appeals. the these which Local case
the

On

other

hand

add

telegram
in this thi

by
to of

Telegraph Telegraphs

Administrator
legally

based

city

file files

as

correspond corresponds
informed for
not

thereto
that the

by

mean means

Federal

Court

was

General by

Control the

and

Registration

Director

Property exist

Secured
in the

Attorney
Federal

General Generals
District
so for

Office
which
is

doe does

Mexico report

City
the is

agreed
three

inform of

plaintiff provided
of

that
in

in

term of

day days
II

it of

may state
the

what

Article

297

Section
in

Federal
to

Code the

Civil

Procedure
Order
in the

applied state
of

suppletory legal

manner with
to

Protective
that the

Act
case

their not

defense
defense
to

the

warning

making

any

thi this regard
as

authority authority will be

in

question will
the

cease

appear

re

and

notification posterior notifications

referred

suspended. send
the the to

Finally
submitted Director Property Minister Property
the

thi this

case

file

by
of

Federal Federal

Attorney Agency
to of the

Investigation
Property Sale Head

Legal

Coordinator attached
of

Service
of the of his

the

Treasury

and

Public

Finance

Administration and Sale

Service

Director
to

General him

Property

Administration and Sale

Service

give

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 5 of 10

PROTECTIVE

ORDER ORDERS

SECTION

P.O.P.

1355/2005

iNC.

full in

title and

the

Minister

of

Public
as

Safety
as

all

domiciled
of

Mexico

City Federal District
Attorney
in

well

the in

Delegate this thi

the

Federal

General Generals
Roo his

Office
of full

based
the

city

State

Delegate

Quintana give him

Federal

Attorney
it

General Generals Office
is

to

title
to be

for which listed in

decided

that

such

report reports

are

reserved

the

respective
Let

motion
it be

hearing.
to the

known

partie parties and

personally

to

the

plaintiff.

Thu Thus

ruled

and Judge

signed
in the

by

Mrs. of

Ana

Maria

Nava

Ortega
Mr. and

Third District Edgar
attest.

State Court

Quintana who

Roo

before

David

Castro
TO

Lara
THE

Clerk

authorize authorizes

ATTEST

FOREGOING.

Illegible signature

Illegible

signature

Michele

Pagano

authorized by the with domicile at

Translator duly qualified and Expert Superior Court of Justice in Mexico City Rio Elba 25-K Col. CuauhtØmoc Mexico
and 5286-29-02
to

City D.F.
certify that and belief document
in

Tel.

5286-81-89

Fax
of of

the

foregoing is true and correct

best translation
the

hereby my knowledge the attached

do

Spanish.

Mexico

City Federal District

September

30

2005.

chele

Pagano

PLo
Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS Document 119-4 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 6 of 10

nU-2s-20 aztz

LIE

socclON

QE AMPARO AMPAROS

J.A 1355/2005.

En veintidAs di sepembre veintidA

del

aæo doe mu guardo
et

Cinco
present. par
ol

cloy

cuonta

to

Jun

con

ci
el

ostado

procosal

quo

InCkleme

do

$uaponain1

lestimonlo Tribunal

do

rssolucln

remttldc

Seoretwlo de

Col4ado del VigØsimo SØptirno Circulta con resk1Qn1g en ests dudad ii tulegrama est Cos Intonnea pravios. rsgistradca con los nOmerea 30355 3fl 3ai 30046. i0353 30106 30314 40335y 30283 mspactivsmente.Conate
dci

Muotdo Muotdos

ot.

UC.

OAR
do

PAVV

ThO LAfl

Cancthi doe nit cinco.

QulMano Rca

nlnhldO nlnhldOs

aeptiemby aeptiembys

dii

sæo

Visto

to

Inlormado par

ii

Secretarlo

errazn
Inente

de curia gut da suspension

anteced anteceds
paro
cual
el

so acuerda

gkse

preao

eticta etictas legalea pertinsntes pertinsnte Seeretado do con

oMnimero
Tribunal

9390 means.

of

Acu.$qd

Cologiado SI VigOsimo
remito

SØptirno Circulto

idJen
do
to

sate

chided

en ciieclnueve

toja tojas tWoe
relaflvo

reaoiuclOn

teoronto

pronunclada

en

it

boa

at

redtqueJa

nme.D

130/2005

interpuesto

par las

Ue1OSa%4Ai6tOPe
en

HOLDING HOLDINGS

UMIrED

CABAFIN

UMITED

COntI a00erdo
en
ol

di fetha nueve

do septiembre dii aæo doe mIt
las referidsa

quo

so

to

negO

Ia

euspenoln

provisIonal

Jmpetrantee

do garantias. punlo resolutivo dotarminO

La resoludOn do guejo en su
Ic

rilco

siguiente

Omco.- Es

fwadado

oi

rocurso

qua/ qua/s
limited

Mterptaa Mterptaas par

HastaIop HastaIops H0wm95 Limited dl nuave Totter Totters do sepllembn
do

GauNt

en contra del autc
ii

doe ntiS clnco nti

dItado pop

Just
sip

DSrho en
en
it

Estada do

di Ou4Ptana
suapenalØn

R04

con

asS

cot cots

cludad

Incident

retlvti SI MiMic

do

1355X ams 1355XS
Acigge
Phora
rocitic

do

estilo.

bten

on

istricto

ixunpllmkrnth

to

c5etermnacln

omitida

per

ci

Tribunal

Colegiado

dot

VisImo

SØptlmo

Circulto

con

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 7 of 10

lcrYJv_t

kji

Lt P.2

SECCION

OS AMPAMOS AMPAMO

4.. 1368/2006. INC

msldencla en

cludac

so concede CASAFIP1

laS

quosa ARTSLQPE quosas
la

MOLDING MOLDINGS
provisional

UMITED

LIMITED
en

suspensiOn astaOo en quo
Ia

un do quo las casio so manlengan

actualmente se encuantran Caravan

no so dlsponga

anojene

soronave

uossna

2083 con nUmera
taftcAptera

de svle 20680941 matrfcula XA-TSR. mecca

XA

fliP

eat

coma

Matricufo

modem

Augusta lndicadn

A-109E con nmeio do tone

118

en

Ia

lmeilgencf

qua las

QronSVo QronSVos
Is

contlnunÆn en au carOcter

00 bianee tsegumdoa

dentro

do

aveiiguacln

rev1a

PC3PJ$IEDOUEIOFM/015/2004

diapoelc6n do las autorhdadee
tanto

aenalada aenaladas

coma

respansables.

has

en

so notifique scarce do

Las autoridadea

responsablee.

is

resoluclAn

quo se

thorn

Is

suspensiOn

definitive

en

prosente

nciOenc1a

anterior

efocto

do evltar qua so oausen daloe do mcit repwaSOn

lee aludida aludidas

quojosa quojosas con
tfene

ejocuciAr ejocuciArs del

aao reciamado.
Ia

Al

aac

apllcecton

is

tal tals
do

sustentade

par

Primer an

Sala

de

to

Supreme Carte do Judois Judoi
del

Is

PIaci6n

4stbe

Is

pÆgna
do
ma

2333

Tome

LXXXVII

Quinta

paaa

604

8etnanarb

Juololsi

F$doacin

QUO 00 del tenor

literal

elguiente

szaspsl4n no pusde npwar lS2$cto as es 85091/ramlanto 00f0 de sue consacuonma coma son quo so dlscings del alqwesaao oqSw dlscing pot las suladdadas suladdada responsoblea haYunde dl area areas QntnQga personae Ia 81 tta.glsokje oto liigw Come Comes oonacuenol.g qua derherr do 1sf 03 scIon flQUB frnpWe ee seaftos usea fto
At

ASEGUUAMIENTO DEL OBJETO DEL DELITO SUSPENSION TflATANDOsg GE.- 3/ so asegurd el Objl eta dWfto as mdtftMb qua

an

cerdcrey

do

qua no so eSote ci ovdem pObflcr Ce negu.csoo. SspcMj

consec9 paaiops paaiop
al

asomnmjp

nsnol

m1ncai 10CR VSz que pecauto/ quo ren pecauto/s

dMa

dkho obmto csint4nI Cs door Ca La

an

smiaip
no v/one
ql.e

usa

ABeQuamon
c4leto

asijn
sor s/rp

en

Ic

do otI
Igualmente done

e4lp

sp Xfl$uq7fq

un

aplicadØn

teala

Suten0
Nacin

$oa de

par

Ia

PrImers PrImer

a

Suprerna

Cane do Juevcfa

visible

en

to

pAgina

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 8 of 10

dUtlFiJb

u33

DE

flS24S36
SECION
DE AMPARO AMPAROS
J.A.

P.3

1355/2006.

437 del

Tomo

LXXXVII

Quirtla

Epoce

del

Sarnanarlo JudIcial

do

La

Federaoin

quo os del tenor

literal

guiente

tIO$J

ASEOIJRAMIENTQ DEL. OSJETO DEL. Aun tuato asguramlonrC llett pa nots QWBT4 QOfl ---fl/ngUfl pwjuclo so CUSR

DEL

aasm
fin

SUSPENSiON
dot

not

objoto

Si4SPEnEl7 concedida

par pars

---jurIdlc ---jurIdlcs

RO

doWns quo no so clispongs do los b/ones rn/entree rio so doWn Eu si/usc/On clispong b/one robioeve ni tondo ISo was quooidapostraro anp4pc nombraco esos oonssponda. una vet onflgard eso bSrs quien tarrntna.jo olaeunso.

bSr

Asimiento Sale do

cobra

aplicaciOn

La

tsSht

austefltaCa

por

La

Primers Primer

Ia

Supreme

Cone do

Justicla

de

Ia

Nacln

visible

on

Is

pÆgina

985

dot

Trio

XCVU

Qulnta Epoca.

dot

gmarianio

JudicIal

cte

Ia

Pederacln.

qua as del tono

literal

DEL OBlt4EL DELJT4 SUSPENSION ASEGURAMIENTQ EN tACO DL- La susponsldn esjyffcedsnro con of ccumment conS
do Joe b/one b/ones objoro dot do/ftc paibjfl Uewmtsc/flfl dfflcuftvla in del pr/onto qui.c La 6ase do lode pmeasc penal. puosic ccmprobacln ot Ettado fl Jntorado an Is aworuacl6n Jntorados quo to sociodad do
doiitosy

en
Los

amnft
at

cast/go dadps dadp 4fr1rosuiran mwtnsahies dg gJo mwtnsahie olQcto olQctos dot oumnSrnrz oeM/edna pore quojoso
ol

fiat fiats conthtlr on precede
to

jafnjto

yadfi4lcsdOn

sztJiS/Wtha
ylil

do las

do

do lea nwtanofss asogurade nwtanofs asogurades puesto quo eonosnnn los mqsfloe atlao 24 dot Lay do Amparo. dots

fMcto1fI1

Mnte
vPtmtonto
do qua cumplan coplo totostitica

alicia

qua

51

etecto

as

gin gins hÆgKse

Ic

anterior

del

do as autoridades aeæaludes autoridade aeæalude con

come raeponsabln

fin

Ia

indicada

dntcnnlnacln do

pan
to

t51

tIn.

roitlIasele roitlIaseles

debidamento

certifluacia

porte

conducente

del

tostintonto

do resoiudn

dictada

par

el

siudido

Inbunat Ce alzada.

Par atre

porte ttrØguaa.

eatoe auto para qua abc abcs autos
ei

oomo

legalmente corneeponda con

telegroma roruitldo par soda

Adnlnlatrador

Local

do

TelØgratos TelØgrato

en

en
at

cludad

travØ travØs

del

cual

irdorma

ate Juzgado Pederal
ac

qu

Cone DMCW ConeS 8. Contr
exlst

Registro

Aaguramtento
Ic

Mlntotorlale Mlntotorlales no

Olotrito

Foderal

quo

so

acuerda
del

des.

part parts queosa

pare quo

ntro

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 9 of 10

thUE

Q3J

WE

54ESG
rnRWAQQ

BECCIP4

OSAMPARO OSAMPAROS
Ii
an

SaCOON

Ot AMPARQ3

is

iaastwos.

INC.

of

rnlftuk

297

fracclbn

II

daf

S6dgo
Jo

sderaI
Lay

do ProCodimen1Ds ProCodimen1D manlieto

CIvkIe CIvkIes

apUcadc

suplotorlernenta

do

Ampam

to

quo

ott

dorecho

oouosponda

con

at

Dtrtibmlqnto qua do no

pronunciarse

al

reapecto

so dejaiÆdo tenor reforarmia

omo

rosonaabIe

on

sore

asunto

La

auoqIdg

do

so susponder4n

las

poatodor$e

notificoemne notificoemnes per

cs

quo

Aste so

iSleto.

Pnalrnanlo

glsense

usia expedient.

InckWnal.

los

lnrormn do

rendidus pro vici rendidu pQr Fedorot

at

Procurador

General

do

to

Republics. ttutar

Agenda
adscritg
ai

do

tnvesilgacin

000rdInadbr

Jurcdico

de Blanea

Sarvlcic

do EnajenaclOn Os Planes. Secvetatlo do HecIands HecIand
Titular dot Survitfo

Cridfto

Pbllo

do AdminttlUn SOMCIQ
do

Enajonadn

do

Blanee

Dlroclor

Oune OuneS
eu coaecta

MnThotrecltr
Saevstarlo

EnajenaclOn

do

Blefle en Blefles

denomInation
en

do

Soguilood corno

PCsblIca

taCo taCos eon

dccnetIto

Mexico Ce

Dlst$to

Federal

aol

Detegado do

Procurodurla General

to RepCibff

os con

eerie

on sets dudS set Genera do acuerde
autentia

dud

Celogeds otataI Celoged
Aep4bIlea. on
tiu

en Qulniano
denornlrtadn

Ret do

is

ProGuradurla

conecte
dicho dichos

to

quo so
en

reSrvense pars ser reieolonadoe par
Incidental

lnfonn

mspectlvn.

Nolifiquesa

peronstmnt peronstmnts
time
en
to

ta

psd

quejese. Maria

Ml Jun

to

pravsy do

ticenclada

Ma
do

Nave

Orlada
Onto

TarQ

Dletcho

at

Estado

Qulntana

Roe

Itcenefado

Edgar

Davtd

Ca6V1i

Secretarlo

quo

avtortza

do

DcnFE.

Case 2:04-cv-00363-JWS

Document 119-4

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 10 of 10