Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

p I if Case 3:02ecv-01723,C Document 105 Filed 01/OQOS Page 1 of 1 I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F um g D ‘
I FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
i du ZUUH NOV 2Ln P 2= Ob
A EASCO HAND TOOLS, INC., ) Civil Action No. 3:02 CV<,_ ( § RT j
ARMSTRONG TOOLS INC., KINGSLEY ) Civil Action No.
TOOLS INC., LEA WAY HAND TOOL ) I *"i*""*i`“ N ‘ k` ° `J `
CORPORATION, AND MATCO TOOLS )
CORPORATION, )
)
_ Plaintiffs, ) gi p
)
-. vs. )
___ )
I-IU, HOl}gFE§_a/l m ¤=’»·¢ )
A A Q, Defendant. )
gm ,..» $3 LB November 24, 2004
U I ' XCD .. .
. •¤¤• |--—L·°·~—
1 . u_ E 22;;:3
E 2 QIEINT MOTION TO CLARIFY AND MODIFY JUDGMENT
1 Ld ga CJ? ..4.22 `
' Defendant Bobby Hu and Plaintiffs Easco Hand Tools, Inc., Armstrong Tools Inc.,
i _ Kingsley Tools Inc., Lea Way Hand Tool Corporation, and Mateo Tools Corporation
1 I * I A
A B respectfully move for clarification and modification of this Court’s Order of Dismissal dated
Fd l November 12, 2004, to provide that Defendant’s counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice,
.m . jg
. M6 Plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed without prejudice, and that Plaintiff Matco Tools Corporation be
Cj
1 » ,4% ` @ included in the Judgment.}
3 F? This case is an action for declaratory judgment. Specifically, Plaintiffs sought a
<¤ E r
C; Q, declaration that they do not infringe Defendant’s U.S. Patent No. 6,457,387 ("the ‘387 Patent").
**1* kv
+-1. ·
E, . X ;Defendant counterclaimed that Plaintiffs willfully infringed the ‘387_ patent and engaged in trade
Q 1 gr]
Q; ` 1 secret misappropriation.
E; ..a,,,_,,,_,1
f\1
LSE I Plaintiffs filed a similar motion on November 18, 2004 (Docket Entry No. 102).
as Plaintiffs and Defendant have conferred and agreed to file this Joint Motion. Plaintiffs have
>~ nn
s4 cn indicated that they will withdraw their November 18, 2004 motion forthwith.
S $5 I
§ O 139539.01/2186.00200 l 2
j n ca
I ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED
I