Free Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 52.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 312 Words, 2,200 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19666/104-2.pdf

Download Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Connecticut ( 52.2 kB)


Preview Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Connecticut
U\=·=·-e··=····" Céajse 3:02-cv—O1723jMC Document 104-2 Filed 11)!2004 Page 1 of 1
\ Q IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F 5 L
`I FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT E Q
ZUUU AUG -5
D :
EASCO HAND TOOLS, INC., ) I 35
ARMSTRONG TOOLS INC.,KINGSLEY ) U_S_ Qggrq T O
TOOLS lNC.,LEA WAYHANDTOOL ) Civil Action N0. 3:02 C£N\}£{7§#@‘7gN(§é-{UR?
CORPORATION,ANDMATCO TOOLS ) _ ' ‘
CORPORATION, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
I
vs. ) August 5,2004
, )
HU, HOU-FEI, a/k/a BOBBY HU, )
)
Defendant. )
____..i..........................”“”__...;)
DEFENDANT I-IU’S MOTION TO DISIVHSS
THE ORIGINAL 1747 CASE
J. Hoke Peacock III I
Federal Bar No. ct24230
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
I000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 _ Wm
` 3:02cv1'723 (AVC). November 10, 2004. This is an action for a
declaratory judgment. The plaintiffs and counterclaim~
defendants, Easco Hand Tools, Inc., Armstrong Tools, Inc.,
Kingsley Tools Inc., and Lea Way Hand Tool Corporation, seek a
declaration that they have not infringed the so—called ‘387 if
patent held by the defendant and counterolaimmplaintiff, Bobby ’
Hu. The patent covers reversible ratchet wrench technology. By g
way of counterclaim, Ho alleges that the plaintiifs willfully I "
infringed his patents and engaged in trade secret
misappropriation. The defendant now moves for voluntarily
. dismissal of all claims pending in this matter and to dismiss all
claims pending in the counterclaim for want of subject matter
jurisdiction. The motion for voluntary dismissal of the
complaint is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss the counterclaim for
want of subject matter jurisdiction is also granted. ` .
dismissal of the counterclaim is for want of subject m&g,er _
jurisdiction, dismissal is_ordered_,_m_` rejudice. §·
E f .:;]:-:7 " .
SO ORDERED. ;»»»»-§~»- _,,._ ,_ ,..T.--,.,-,..-. .,.. ____ Qeg., , ¤q"`1; ,_.,. " I - _
-, _._. j ‘ .
A, . -,.11 ·¤,-,4 ,i.~».x_-` ~. __._ I u L_
United tates District Judge §,—` I I .·<
, "‘
O s~.<:.vl‘79~?2>_c~1>¤{ si. 1 _ _ M