Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 79.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: November 12, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 346 Words, 2,189 Characters
Page Size: 599.04 x 794.16 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19666/101.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 79.7 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Connecticut
©\·§-·· é 3:02-cv-01723QC Document 101 Filed 11/1 @04 Page 1 of 1
. A \ H\I THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F I L
1 i _ FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT § D `
ZUUM AUG -5
FJ :
EASCO HAND TOOLS, INC., ) I Bb
ARMSTRONG TOOLS INC., KINGSLEY ) U.$,Q,13°[q T O, ,, 1
TOOLS INC., LEA WAY HAND TOOL ) Civil Action N0. 3202 I{7?;$i&gHéé-IFIR '
j CORPORATION, AND MATCO TOOLS ) ° ‘
CORPORATION, ) Cl/4/WJ
Y )
Plaintiffs, )
1 .
I )
t vs. ) August 5,2004
l )
1 HU, HOU-FEI, a/k/a BOBBY HU, )
H )
Defendant. )
I I
I DEFENDANT HU’S MOTION TO DISMISS
THE ORIGINAL 1747 CASE
· J. Hoke Peacock III i
i Federal Bar No. ct24230 I `
1 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 g V t W
r` 3:O2cv1723 (AVC). November 10, 2004. This is an action for a
declaratory judgment. The plaintiffs and counterclaim- .
I defendants, Easco Hand Tools, Inc., Armstrong Tools, Inc.,
1 Kingsley Tools Inc., and Lea Way Hand Tool Corporation, seek a
3 declaration that they have not infringed the so-called ‘387 g
l patent held by the defendant and counterclaim-plaintiff, Bobby `
Hu. The patent covers reversible ratchet. wrench technology. By ,
way of counterclaim, Hu alleges that the plaintiffs willfully . ' ”
1 infringed his patents and engaged in trade secret
i misappropriation. The defendant now moves for voluntarily
1 dismissal of all claims pending in this matter and to dismiss all
claims pending in the counterclaim for want of subject matter
U jurisdiction. The motion for voluntary dismissal of the
11 complaint is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss the countercétaim for
jg want of subject matter jurisdiction is aisetgmnued. N . A
f dismissal of the counterclaim is for want of subject mitgler
i jurisdiction, dismissal is_or.d.e_r,e_dn»1zA't rejudice. :?`c}3“ §I an
1 . I ·~··¢ ·<= I,
l I SO ORDERED I ~I» II.I I
11 i ‘`i -“- l`~,, `f'·J("'j QL; I ‘ I
`1 . • . Q I y ;·~.{© K I.V· I
1 United tates District Judge § ¤ A .¤
1 I I ·—·v
I Bu
I O s`cvt`7Q-3e~1>qg<5 it , _ ____