Free Order on Motion to Reopen Case - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 51.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: September 27, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 297 Words, 1,797 Characters
Page Size: 602.16 x 784.08 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19666/100.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Reopen Case - District Court of Connecticut ( 51.2 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Reopen Case - District Court of Connecticut
x éie 3:02-cv—01723-.· Document 100 Filed 09/27/@4 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g g jh g
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 1 ‘ imma
__ _ ZUUUSEP 2% 53
EASCO HAND TOOLS, INC., ) C1V1l Action No. 3:02 CV 172 ( V
ARMSTRONG TOOLS INC., KINGSLEY ) 4_§g_ mg5"§‘j;NCT CONQT
TOOLS INC., LEA WAY HAND TOOL ) {jx [/Eg fg? Q ijv STM
CORPORATION, AND MATCO TOOLS ) i 1
CORPORATION, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
vs. )
.; >
p‘I·l`U, HOU-FEI, a/k/a BOBBY HU, )
·_ ·’j Defendant. ) SEPTEMBER 22, 2004
. ` 7 A 1 I {gg ¤~··
t Cr;
§ Q NS x TE Y 0 MOTION TO REINSTATE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:02CV1747 AVC
Z ~ . R ,,,A_ M q a.: A
q ' I . Olf[)ec§}hllier 17, 2003, Civil Action No. 3:02 CV 1747 (AVC) (the "1747 Action") was
· 1 ` mm ¤·
§ {/`i”"·qj&@Ol1d5L‘t';-Jed w¤ithIQivil Action No. 3:02 CV 1723 (AVC) (the "1723 Action"), with the 1723
N _ X rw zi .:.. TZ
_ . Q"Action designated as the lead case and the 1747 Action designated as a member case. (See Order
n\
C; Q . . J of Consolidation attached hereto as Exhibit A.) On July 23, 2004 this Court entered judgment, in .
0 as .
E § response to defendant Hu’s Motion to Dismiss his own claims and Easco’s claims, dismissing all
u O
(Qi 9) claims and counterclaims in the lead 1723 Action. Inlight of the judgment of dismissal in the
1723 Action, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court sever and reinstate the member 1747
Action, for the purpose of allowing the Court to rule on defendant Hu’s pending motion to i
dismiss his own claims and Easco’s claims in that case. Counsel to defendant Hu, Jonathan
Pierce, Esq., consents to this motion. A
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED