Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

( C? 3:02-cv-01-$3-AVC Documgt 103 Filed 11/23/2004 Pagegf 1
A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ·
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
o
4:
is
iv EASCO HAND TOOLS, INC., ) Civil Action No. 3:02 CV 1723 (AVC)
§ ARMSTRONG TOOLS INC., KINGSLEY ) W
§ TOOLS INC., LEA WAY HAND TOOL )
· O CORPORATION, AND MATCO TOOLS )
*·’ CORPORATION, )
'° )
g Plaintiffs, )
'U )
. S vs. ) I
JJ ·-HU, HOU-FEI, a/k/a BOBBY HU, ) #.2,,
s.» _ 6 ) E?
3 U} Defendant. ) November 18, 2004 . 5;
U ` It gv
·= :> crit "*
.2 ig I MOTION TO CLARIFY AND MODIFY JUDGMENT DISMISSING THEQRIGYNA
*" Q § 1747 CASE FT
"·' ··* ~ ———4 M
0
Mc; V g The;?Plai@ffs (collectively "Easco") respectfully move for clarification and modcmcati
L' , *U $4 @*5 A
gale $0% CoQ;t’s of Dismissal dated November 12, 2004, to provide that Defendant Hu’s
Y V C.) (ICI
5-;; l' geeuqdterclainiigris af§ éibmissed with prejudice, and that Easco’s claims are dismissed without
‘ 3*-* :5
5 * :c'pi’éj‘¤dice.§ L2?
cu , g U?
2 The l747)case is an action for declaratory judgment. Easco sought a declaration that i
ns
0 gi, has not infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,457,387 (‘387) held by Defendant Hu. Hu counterc1aime<
v-I
· ew
§ Ig that Easco willfully infringed the ‘387 patent and engaged in trade secret misappropriation.
N LI
_ 8 On August 5, 2004, Hu moved this Court to voluntarily dismiss with prejudice his
m o ·
2 ff E counterclaims. (See Defendant Hu’s Motion to Dismiss the Original 1747 Case at 1-3.) Huy I
tu C Ld . .
§ gw g further moved to dismiss all of Easco’s pending declaratory judgment claims for gf suliig
:> ··o . 2;., $:2
2 91 matter jurisdiction. (See Hu’s Motion at 3 - 6.) Ti "‘
25 22, °°
'U
cv
· c·> cv
r··-+ cf: F