Free Order on Motion to Compel - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ -R...._..L....;..r__;.._i...r-.._....L...__.;_.L._.. -1.R I
R TR- I R
I , ‘ I Case 3:02-cv-01723.-AVC Document 59 Filed 12/O4/200 R);;_|[email protected];,¤BTmc ew];
R - -- Cj (__RjR
3 . . R. R ·-·— ._
` I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT R R R ‘_ i IR
R FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ·· I
"(Q ,R..w ,,,;., ·-_ . l I .}_..,_
R an EASCO HAND TOOLS, INC., : CIVIL ACTION. NO. 3:0 CVR1'”723‘{AVC) 'RRR R R` [ R
R LE ARMSTRONG TOOLS, INC., : fm __W______ { _,A_ _P
tf KINGSLEY roors, mc., LEA WAY . M ~> UR ¤;,l.@’—2 t-RR U U.?} li *
R "Q5 HAND root. coRPoRAT10N and ; H·‘·**"~ ' F UMD Cl
R MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION : R
.:.1 U} .
R 'Y Plaintiffs, : R —
0 cn .
Ra. I . R
__, O Uys. — . R
R IR 5=.= D * R
*23* = 6HU, HOU-FEI afk/a BOBBY HU : R
R"' 'S · Z i I
3 ·E( - gl Defendant. : AUGUST 5, 2003 R R
-»+ .0 _ 0 R .
O {Tn: O
if G, MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTI FS’ FI ST SE OF
3 in rg INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDA NI R
‘;i' · uw R R
as 0 s.:
-515 E Pursuant to Rule 37 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LoRal Rule of Civil ;
$4 U
{L 3, Procedure 37, Plaintiffs, Easco Hand Tools, Inc., Armstrong Tools, Inc., K n sley Tools, Inc.,
.1.5 (L} g
rs ¤¤ R
’“' Lea Way Hand Tool Corporation, and Matco Tools Corporation (collective y the "PIaintiffs"),
.u .0
-=· ~l—J R
E; respectfully request that Defendant Hou-Fei Hu, a/k/a Bobby Hu (“Hu"), b compelled to
IO ’
3 respond to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories To Defendant, served on J uary 14, 2003.
5 E
RU Further, asTset fp rth in the accompanying affidavit of Matthew J. Becker, th partieshave met R
.2 E? '”* ‘ R
5 8 £iIdI€confg?ied iiigiaagood faith attempt to resolve their disputes but have bee unable to achieve a
-¤¤ ¤—¤ R? .R"fQR¤?n .
`Q 3 satisfactory res-ojlfiftion.
2 R
5:; ,
L in ws:
gg ¢¤ y oacuivaaswses
cp ce R .
(RTR R3 _ ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED _ R
ei Li g TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED R R
si .2 nd R
mu 4.: :::1
.0 rn R R
E; 4-¤ M R
GJ ct O R
0 tv
ca > O I
Q G) Ul R
,.j],....;...R 7"