Free Order on Motion for Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Ir
I J.;€§§E11-{’.`;<·YQ.,il;..§, Case 3:02-cv-01723-AVC Document 62 Filed 12/O4/2003 Pa e 1 of ‘ I
— .,~w·g_i . » g I
I I A A O 9~Q° V7 93 E·J“"" I
‘ee I a A r
I I Day, Berry 8c Howard LLP F.,] M A I
‘ I . COUNSELLORS AT LAW
_ Francis H. Morrison III {ITP D
DirectDia1: (860) 275-0231 "““`* "Li F3 ii. 1 I
E-mail: [email protected] H L~` J3 I
ri? IFES? .. I
H A-; *;.1 PSU *i l
M ?j_ CHQ CT:
1
December 1, 2003 j
VIA D DELIVERY `
I
The Hon. Alfred V. Covello
Senior Judge I
United States District Court I
for the District of Connecticut I
450 Main Street I
Hartford, CT 06103
Re: Easco Hand Tools, Inc., etal v. Hu, Hou-Fei a/k/a Bobby Hu, Civil Action N0.
3:02 CV 1723 (AVC) I
Easco Hand Tools, Inc., et ol v. Hu, Hou—Fei a/k/a Bobby Hu, Civil Action No.
3:02 CV 1747 (AVC) |
Dear Judge Coveilo:
. a
. Plaintiffs ask the Court to enter plaintiffs’ proposed scheduling order in these actions,
attached at Tab A. This scheduling order addresses both the general modifications to the
schedule that the parties discussed at the October 22, 2003 Status Conference, and the resolution I
· a . - ... . . ° S~ . mP°l diS°“SS°‘* ‘lF“'i‘?g thc O°*°l’_?F.%2.°?9?fE*;$§2S.€..n! sA- ·:».i1~;!—r ~ A
3 ; O2cv1723 (AVC) ;3:O2cvl'747 (AVC) . December 4, 2003 . The clerk of I
the court is hereby ordered to docket this letter with exhibits I
· as a motion for entry of a scheduling order. Construed as such, 1_ _ I
‘ the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in
the scheduling order issued this day. In particular, to the _ I
· extent the motion seeks a simultaneous sequence of claim __ I · , , _.
construction positions and invalidity disclosure, the motion is I,
granted and the sequence may be found in Paragraph. 2 . I _
extent the motion seeks an order defining the scope of "1nval nw-,I.·I_I _
disclosure, the motion is granted with the scope also ‘fOL11§g‘ J-CII).; I gm {III -
Paragraph 2 . To the exteht the motion seeks to avoid an or er on " i
_ discovery related to the issue of willful infringement , tgg __, I rw KI
motion is DENIED and, as such, a discovery order may be f nd Eh ·*l‘ .. .3 tht; gg
Paragraph 12 . `
. A - I A rw: ver, es;-I
so ORDERED- ; - * a .j;.;i I
Al f red, will 'Covel lo " I
United States District Judge I
1
‘‘-- - .1 sp ti ‘
ggggg I iA`f ` iiiii A ifii iii
ra ‘ ·i- eeee
gggpp I i”i` iliiif D ‘`i iiii ”‘”TiTI“S;;;.;..i.;;rQ1:Ll?f¥Q?f§T