Free Jury Verdict - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

...-.. .,, ‘ I ,I
. - I E I
Case 2.92-cv—OO 14-PCD Document 167 Filed 06/14/ •· Pag 1 of 3
. — I I I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU I I I
O DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I __ 31 I
Z J? LIJZI I II I? ;I=
`O ELEANOR B Y, EDWARD : I I_ ., I ,.E_ II I I, I . I _
DOMBROSKI, HARRY M. ONG, : I . I2 IIIQ ‘ . .- I
SUZANNE C. ERDI, AND ; I ""` **‘" “
WILLIAM E. AUGH, : I I I `
laint@v, : I I
v. · Civ. No. 2:92cv2I 4 "‘ CD)
Tow or WE T IIIART1=oRI;>, I I I I
efendcmt. : I I I
VERDICT FORM I I I I
1. LiabilitI ` I I
A1. as any Plaintiff proven, by a preponderance of I a vidence tI1at he or
he was subjected to excessive/unreasonable t`or I II one of I pre of the
own of West Hartford police officers when ¤II. =!•| at one •I| Iboth ofthe
emonstrations at Summit Women’s Center?
Agril 1, 1989 une 7 ;98
Eleanor rady Yes_______ No es_____ I>__&//
I I
Edward ombrowski Yes__ No! II es__
I I
Harry O g Yes____ No! I es___ I
SuzanneI Verdi Yes_ No Ig I I es__
WilliamIWaugh Yes_ No! I I es__
I I
A2. I you answered "No" to every individual in Inte I ;_ Itory [Al. Ithen your ,
eliberations are complete. Please proceed to III I • have III Iury
reperson till in, sign, and date this verdict fo Il you ans ered "Yes"
t any part of Interrogatory {Al, go to Interrogat · 3. I er
I terrogatory IA3 only for the Plaintift`(s) you G5 · ed "Yes ` Ito in
I terrogatory IAl. I I 2 ”
I
I I I
I _ - .
I Ii I i i
QQ Sivdi ’ otndi C r6i’ eii’ eii’ e4i’ ‘1/1i ’ ‘4i’ ni··
f¢;.L.;.-;—;;;;% ‘.‘. I-` `'II. j` `iii `ii' `ii' ''`ii ' `'‘;i ‘ ‘`‘’i’i ‘’i‘ ‘’i‘ 1---;;ii-g;»e:1»Y-$iYY°*°*
`iii `'`ii ' `ii' `ii' `ii' `ii' ’'`ii ' `ii` `ii' ‘`‘‘ l ‘`··. I I

I I I I I HYYYWM
Case 2:92-cv—OO 14-PCD Document 167 Filed 06/14/ I? · Pag==· of 3 I
. » I I
A3. as any Plaintiff who has proven, by a prepond I . e of the II/idence, that
e/she was subjected to excessive/unreasonable -· prove Ihat any
\ xcessive/unreasonable force he/she suffered w • Inximatel paused by I
C he deliberate indifference thereto and failure to IF rvise on he part of
I hief McCue? I I
April 1, 1989 une 7 :98
¤ I
Eleanor Brady Yes_ No_ es______ III I;>____ I
Edward Dombrowski Yes___ No_ es_____ III I
Harry O g Yes____ No__ I es____ I
Suzann Verdi Yes_ No_ es__
r I
William Waugh Yes_ No_ es__
, I
A4. II you answered "No” to all of Interrogatory IA3, · your =·l berations I
e complete. Please proceed to III and have the 'u III foreper fill in, I
s`gn, and date this verdict form. If you answered ‘ » I·s” to an art of
terrogatory IA3, proceed to Interrogatory II. I
I' I
I
<* I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ‘ I
I I
I I I I I
I I
I I I
I I
I I I
I
I I
<* I I I
I ‘ ’
· II
I

1 _ H W 1 ¥ _— W`.
Case 2:92-cv-OO 14-PCD Document 167 Fnled 06/14/ · Page 13 of 3 E
1 1 E 1
‘ “ 1 1 1
II. Damag s ` _ 1
Answe this Interrogatory only for any Plaintiff(s) you 1 · ered "Y :1” to in
{w Interro atory IA3. 1 1
A at amount of compensatory damages, if any, 1 -1 each Pla itiff whom
ou find was subjected to excessivefunreasonab 1. ce were roven to be Y
roximately caused by Defendant Town of Wes 111 |1= ford’s 1 lure to 1
upervise? Your answer may be different for •1 ’ aintiff 1
Eleanor Brady $ 1 1
Edward Dombrowski $ I 1
Harry ng S 1 1
Suzann Verdi $ 1 Z
Willia Waugh $ l| 1
B or each part of Interrogatory IA3 you have ans e ·• “yes," 1 id for any
laintiff who has not proved entitlement to com 11 - tory d 1 ges, what
mount of nominal damages do you award? 1 1
1
Eleanor Brady S 1 _ 1
Edward Dombrowski $ 1 1
H8.I°I'y Hg L__ 1 1 1
Suzann Verdi $ 11 1 1
Willi Waugh $ 1 1
(D1 1 1 1 1
.___ 1 1 1
III. Your d liherations are complete. Please have the ju reperso 1Hll in, sign, 1
and dat this verdict form. I 1 1
.: 1 1 wil as 1
“ FOI`Cp*11 OH
I · U I1 i Q I
D&1|‘
1
11 11
1
1 1 1 1 1
11 1 1 1
1 1
11 1 y
3 1 1 ;
1 I
._ _.1. * 1 1 1
1 1 1 1