Free Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 80.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 2, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 455 Words, 2,979 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/5318/152.pdf

Download Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut ( 80.8 kB)


Preview Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut
" OOOO TT”T“"““ITTTT""TT"T‘TTT“" | HMm—lll ¥*_;m“`l'F`"”—"`“+F
Case 2:92-cv-00214-_|?CD Document 152 Filed 06/01/ Pag 1 of 2
{ 5 rj - W
I ” V- ""** =* ¢·¤ -=¤·=
M Dm,
lu l NEW. HAVEN
F » W I
I ‘ * ·¤¤..· ···· 4
*a'l. \ QV;} in
“ i *?‘5T¢' ¥i'T · -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURH
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTIW\|
AMNESTY AMERICA, et ai., ; No. 2:92 iO2l4 (I CD)
Plaintiffs, y
VS . ` . l
TOWN OF WEST HARTFORD, z JUNE I, I I4
Defendant. I _
DEH`ENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE RE: EV an :1 ` CE IN
SUPPO · T OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM OF MUNICIP nl I IABI __n TY
Defendant Town of West Hartford respectfu%lm_movew to
preclude introduction by plaintiffs of any evilenbe of$police
conduct directed toward persons other than the •TaintiWfs absent
a preliminary showing that the alleged conduct Qs win essed by ‘
Chief McCue or was the subject of a complaint I it waslnot
investigated. " ‘ 1
As set forth in the accompanying memorand“ gof lai, without
this requisite preliminary showing, all testimw . and wvidence
relating to officers' alleged behavior is simpw QirreL=vant to
the determination of whether the Town can be lr-wle in this case.
Moreover, admission of such evidence would be “ mairly
prejudicial to this defendant. " I
WHEREFORE, defendant moves that its motio we gra ted.
sncx, smzcron Ann mnsrsn, um · Anonwsvs ll I
836 FARMINGTIDN AVE., SUITE 221·WEST HARTFORD, CT 06119-1544·(860) 233- I: URIS NO. I ’ ( 776
· s.....l;.=.rs-.—.w..w . · n l 3..-..,-.llf
5 ~ Z; l-.r K J D-
-..j ...j _._j ___j ,.,- ___j ____
...` . as I-I; 1. Inla. lnl. lnap fllf D--} ``T` " in J ‘‘·‘ * -f-·a
.ff. lln. FQ `nly I f.f_ if T”T_ Q ```,

l ' ?' I , {
Case 2:92-cv-OO21<4=I5’CD Document 152 Filed 06/0 4|l•·· Pag 2 of 2
DEFENDANT, u•Hi OF ,EST
HARTFORD I !
• ·
B c.¤•»¤- r, paid .
Nicole D. _&1’1 1 p E
Federal Bar“ wt: ctm7030
_ Sack, Spectw gh Karsten
836 Farmingn n;Avenie
West Hartfo¥•h CT 0@119
.ndorman@sac - ec . c
CERTIFICATION I
This is to certify that a copy of the formgwdng bps been
I I l 1
hand-delivered, this 1st day of June, 2004, to the fol owing
counsel of record: ;
John R. Williams, Esquire
Williams & Pattis, LLC
51 Elm Street .
New Haven, CT 06510 _
Patrick G. Alair, Esquire
Office of the Corporation Counsel
Town of West Hartford
50 South Main Street
West Hartford, CT 06107
l
l' I
Q6/·<-4-»~ gl · gmail;.
Nicole D. Jl;- sn I
SACK, SPECTOR AND KARSTEN, LLP · Arr0n~EvsA l
aaa ¤=AnMmeTc:>N Ave., sum; zzvwnzsr HAm·•=om>, cr asm-1s44·(aao) ass- _un¤s no { we
m :——_1‘—*