Free Motion in Limine - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

1 11 *·*# ~1~1####~#—-~——— ——;———~——a-ge—~—————————-—————~—————————~·»»~»~ 1-·—--1 as-AiT...1.-. `._.iMH.-.-..
N . 11 1I
Case 2:92-cv-OO21¢1;PCD Document 151 Fnled O6/Q1/ Pag 1 013
0 < U !1 1 1
1 m¤t1:·i qrffbnamnim-
1 ‘ I 1 , I _
lil. D E N-EW HB.@N
”111 *.1. ,, 2
¤|'1Fh in ` i .~'*€*·
I -a»W_h£L»i_ 1 1
1 I ms _ an “"“
UNITED STATES DISTRICT couj § 1
- FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTIN w 1
AMNESTY AMERICA, et al., ; No. 2:9 00214é RcD) 1
Plaintiffs, 1 1 I
1 1
VS . i E
TOWN OF NEST HARTFORD, ; JUNE I, 2 04 Q
Defendant. 1 1
_ l)EFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMI 1 i
RE' PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS OF INJURY AND ,,__ AG ¤ '1
Pursuant.to Federal Rule of Civil Procedi 3 37(d)(l),
defendant Town of West Hartford respectfully g•Ies ta preclude
introduction by plaintiffs of certain evidenc“,mtestNNony or
argument relating to their claims of injury, 1 iatmedm and/or
damages for the reason that plaintiffs failed1 £ disdiose
medical records and/or bills documenting such meatmd t and i
expenses in response to defendants’ discoveryi aquesd- seeking 1
such information. N :_
As an initial consideration, defendant owjmcts dw any and I
all proposed testimony by any of the plaintifw-mreganding
11 1 1
medical conditions and Subjects, except as spw•·ficaLiy
permitted by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3). I

sncx, sPEc·r0n Ann aunsrsn, LLP •ATTORNEYS i| - I
836 FARMINGTGQN AVE., SUITE 221 ·WEST HARTFORD, GT 06119-1544·(86D) 233- 5 I UFIIS N0. @ 776
t_._ 11 .. 11 .. 11 .. I __ I __ 1-~..;1..l.I,i ,2r....,,i.2,,.,,i..lIr12l,1I1..lI1, __._ .. I __ 1 __ 1 . 1 ?1J
is,J;QQEI:__Q__r_4__.,.....,,,.gLQQ;gLLL;L1;:;;;zs;A IjI·1I~a—
1 a111 --1- ,111;* 111+ .1.1 I--2; _1.1 I I _1_1 _ , up, .. 11 .. I __ I __ by __ gg 11 ‘‘`‘ 1 11 11‘1 1 1111 1"`1 1 1111 ··1·
11II 1 Ofit YQ 111. 1 1i 1. ilit 1 1111 1if1 1111 11i1 11i1 1 1111 1 1111 rr11i 1 1111 1 1111 1 1111 1 1111 1 1111 1 11111 1 11111 1 .1111 1 1111 1 ,,11.1 1 .11.1 1 ,,.1.1 1 .1.1
11 11 11 =~=~»-@1 -.III 1
1111 - 1111 --1- $1 ;-1—= .1-1 .1.1 2 : _1.1 .11, I--I, 1,_, .._1 .. I __ I __ by __ U, 1 11 ‘‘`‘ 1 111111 1 1111 1111
Iiii 1 QQ 111. YQ iiiit TQ 1111. 1 11 1. 11 1. 1 1111. 1111 1 11l1 1111 11111 1 1111 1 11111 1 1111 1 1111 1 1111 1 11111 1111 1 1111 1 1111 1 1111 1 1111 1 11111 1 .1111 1 11111 1 ,,11.1 1 1111 1 111.1 1 1111 I ,,11.1

II = 1 `
Case 2:92-cv-OOZFL-UPCD Document 151 Filed 06/p16 • Pag=1· 2 of 3
1
In addition, plaintiff William Waugh disYl»sed jo bills or
other evidence relating to his claimed medical %reatmJnt.
1
No records of treatment or bills from DrN loomisawere
provided by Eleanor Brady. While records of m , Srid.ran were
11 1
provided, no bills or statements of charges fm suchzireatment
have been produced. " W
In accordance with Rule 37(c), a party tv.I faiLW to
disclose information required by Rule 26(a) o“ io ams d a
response pursuant to Rule 26(e)(2) is not per“i¤ted c# use as
evidence at trial such undisclosed informatio“.I Infowmation and
documentation relating to claimed injuries ani reatmwnt must be
disclosed pursuant to Rule 26(a). These plaivtiffs m st
therefore be barred from introducing or refer1i g to‘jhe above
referenced information at trial. 1 N
DEFENDANT, TOWN OI WEST HARTFORD
[ 1 1 1W
B { An.44 ` l. `
Nicole D. W•mman ·1
Federal Ba" 50.: dwO703O
Sack, SpecH•m & Kawsten
836 Farming wh Avdyue
west Hemi ··| cw . 6119 1
I .I‘1dOfm5.I‘1@S {Eg. ec . ¤;•
$AcK, sPEc1‘¤R AND KARSTEN, LLP · ATTORNEYS A _ i
ass FARMINGTCDN Ave., sum: zzpwssw HARTFORD, cr ¤611s-154-wasn) asa- lil unns No. 5 776 `
~————————-1%-··— 11·1*——rt#“r

Case 2:92-cv-OO2%4$PCD Document 151 Filed 06/0.16 · ll • · Pag 3 of 3
{ .
A i
CERTIFICATION | 5
This is to certify that a copy of the fon=goingE as been
hand—delivered and mailed, postage prepaid, tWi! 1st·•ay of
June, 2004, to the following counsel of recorw: -
_ John R. Williams, Esquire
Williams & Pattis, LLC
51 Elm Street
New Haven, CT 06510
Patrick G. Alair, Esquire E
Office of the Corporation Counsel Q
Town of West Hartford
50 South Main Street
West Hartford, CT 06107
u I,
Q5 _ _ ra _' A!li:L;... ., R
Nicole D. m• man
$AcK, SPECTOR AND KARSTEN, LLP · ATTORNEYS A II -i
836 |=AnM|NeTd>r~1 Ave., sum; 221-wssr HAFm=0n¤, cr 03119-1344-(330) 233- ml urns N0. 5 173 1 |
ni" I l WT