Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

---- -- rr-, rr——r ————— ------- --l·-—--;.....+}tirA...._ ..___-- ____ ___ M u“uV_—_{i*m mé
Case 2:92-cv-00214-PCD Document 166 Filed 06/01/ gg •· Pag 1 Of 3
4 TTI O I
E “%wm&u . i- T
E `.* · h.. mq ||,_ ,6,,. U I a
kw ··#»·. .·._.- Q
/ me me
/ ~@»· ' \ , 2
i '"• · Ocrxb ‘
¥*·E¢·Ia:I·?ar;:42 · M,.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTIM i {
AMNESTY AMERIQZA, eu al., ; NO. 2 ; WI 00214 TCD)
Plaintiffs,
M
vs.
TOWN OF WEST HARTFORD, ; JUNE I, •04 M
Defendant.
_ M
WRI TEN STATEMENT IN LIEU OF OPENIN E I · jhh T
H M
The undersigned ccunsel respectfully reqI==ts thJ& the
Ccurt read the attached written Statement in m'!u Of lm Opening
W M
Statement tO the jury. E
li
T
DEFENDANT, l WN OF WEST
HARTFORD
IQ
*1 3
1 1-
I “ ,
E ca { fh I||! -
-· . nlk
Scott 1VI. === ESE M
Federal Ba& ic.: cm¢5277
Sack, Spec •H Se Ka $’C.€21’1
836 Farminm•En Avelue
West Hartf%¤•, CT 16119
Sk5lI`S’C@I‘1@S • S GC . eg; 0
I?
I1 I
|= Y
U
I3
M

li ·
T
Acx, smzcroa AND Knnsrrsn, u.r · ATTORNEYS ·1~ » .
836 »=AnM¤Nev_ N Ave., suns 221-wesr HAFm=0n¤, cr nam-1544-(asu; zsa ums Nc. */16
l . M. I- ··f···--1-· t·······?—··*—·
A . I _ _ _ V _" V" TT " ~ -- rr .. T, __ __ __ W H nT"*'*":':@'ii*2»}-E; &' if—;¥E‘—'9..'L$€;,-L·5-i:§I;E5·§•E;~E·;n:¤»·~r‘.LZ,.,,,,,,;‘,____r{_--)_Mr..)_,,'r__" _i__
_._,, ; _,,-i y T __s‘‘_,,-II__,‘‘,,.II _ _,··_yy.tt _seI
3 2r,i i ,,,,i j ,r,S j ,,,, [ ,r,0,, A as I if Tfii flfii E ifiif T iiiii T Iini reir I rrses 2222 ,,,, ;,; ,,,, 1, 0,,,, ;-; ,C,,,, rr,2 j ,,,, T j ,,,2 I ,,,,i,i A ,,,I
er;--A, lril llir ``‘i - -e‘‘ E -,-- Y .. `,-- `,-- C
ii g; ii 2-=#»w..—~.A;A i · ' .
_._,, ; ,,-f,f..s``,,-ii__s‘‘ T ,-ii _ _s‘‘_,,-II
iii ,,,S i ,,,,i j ,r,0 I ,,,, T 2; t,e,,j T I A I I if Tiii E ifff iiffli1f‘i Sfiii T Titr A he EANI ,,,, ;-;T ,,,, 02,,,<, ,2,,, T rr,2 j , T ACTT I rr,T
...· EEII M Inii `,-- T,-- TI-- i

N N NI N N N N
Case 2:92-cv-OOfr1CI—ECD Document 166 Filed O6/Q1/ · Pag== 2 of 3
l N ·
i \ _.# R 3
NN
NN I
N2 ;
NN
N NN -
I N 'N N 9
This case has been brought by five indivF• al plvintiffs
N N I N I
against the Trwn of West Hartford for allegedlzicessi e force by
police officers during anti-abortion protestsgel Apri} 1, 1989
and June 17,lp89. Specifically, plaintiffs’ ¤ =im thai the Town
N I
. I N I
of West Hartfprd, acting through its police cN'=f, wa$N
N T I
deliberately Hndifferent to the alleged use on Goree wy its
N
police officers, with the result that these pI.!ntiffT=
N N I
themselves suffered injury and damages from tu: use oMNexcessive
` NN .
force. ‘ H ly
Defendanr denies that the police officers mesponiing to
these protests used excessive force; denies tn-‘ its yolice
N I N
chief was aware at any time that excessive fol.: was weing used
. _ I
by any police officer; denies that it was delk•¤ratel
. N _
indifferent tb any such use of excessive forcv;Iand awaias that
these plaintiffs were injured as a result of r.•essiva force by
NN N j
a West Hartford police officer. E
I Ni N
N
N
NN
I T
NN N
NN N
NN
Ng r
I NN N
ACK, SPECTOR AND KARSTEN, LLP · ATTORNEYS ·N‘ ·
836 FAFIMINGT N AVE., SUITE 221 ·WEST HARTFORD. CT 06119~1544•(860) 233- UFIIS NO. ’"·"'¢N'76
— N N N

I II I I I
Case 2:92-cv-OO` 1Kh.F’CD Document 166 Filed O6/Q1! I0 · Pag== 3 of 3
~ I III
IE I `
I u I



I II
I CERTIFICATION II .
This is to certify that a copy of the foq=;oing fas been
I ·I
hand—delivere@ and/or mailed, postage prepaidu his inf day of
. II
June, 2004, to the following counsel of recorm: I
I I
John R. Williams, Esquire F I
Williams & Pattis, LLC Q
51 Elm StreetI F
New Haven, CTI06510 Q I
II I
Patrick G. Alfir, Esquire E
Office of theICorporation Counsel E f
Town of West Hartford Q
50 South MainiStreet Q I
West HartfordI CT 06107 I
I II
- scout M. I! tem ·
I I I
- II -
II I
I .
II I ·
II I I
. Ii I
I II
I? I ‘
I `
II I
I5 I
I II I
- II I
I II I

. Ii I I
- II -
Acx, spscrcn Ann I 836 FAFIMINGTII AVE., SUITE 221•WEST HARTFORD, CT 06119-1544- (860) 233 I URIS NO. 5 376