Free Proposed Jury Instructions/Request to Charge - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

- - - ------ ----——|—--—·-··--—-·--».7A>)._.|...-_ ..;..,. _)_________ I ` ___ L‘hm._’1— ___-
Case 2:92-cv—OO ?;§’CD Document 158 Filed 06/Q§/ul •· Pagl 1 of 4 E
K I ' *•*‘¢• ¢I·:..·-:·-:»: I::.·.~··h·. •..‘·.;__~~‘
F ·§"· cf |»•s•v.x : •-an .4 " 4
, lEMmD‘{ gmwg§Lvm¤
sm. mar;. ‘ LI
_j !‘ I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURH 5
EOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTIEUI
HI l
AMNESTY AMERIC‘, et al., ¤ N0. 2:92l ®O2l4¢FCD) i
Plaintiff=,
TOWN OF WEST “RTFORD, : JUNE 8, Pnwq E
Defendant. H N Q
DEFENDAN ’S SUPPLEMENTAL RE • UESTS FOR J lf _1 NST ·— `_ CTIONS
Pursuant 0 Federal Rule of Civil Proced u=m51, djfendanti
l a
U I ·
Town of West H=rtf0rd in the above-captioned =¤rer he eby i
Ii »
respectfully s pplements its requests for jur ·stru¢ii0ns asl
l Q
attached. l Q
l i
DEEENDANT, HQUN OFl¤EST 5
HARTFORD |
E
{4X` I Q IW E
B I ‘
Nicole D. •L1Han ` E
Federal Ba lim.: c¤T703O l
Sack, Spec r1u& Ka·ften Q
836 Fafmill •i»|¤ Ave ¤ i•
West Hartf•I1h CT ¤{ll9 Q
1'1dOI`1T13.1’1@S3. ·; lp . an »_ _
1
E
3 I
l !
i
\
Acx, smacron Ann numsrsu, n.u= mrronusvs ·; -· I l
836 FARMINGT N AVE., SUITE 221•WEST HARTFORD. CT 06119-1544•(860) 233- I UFIIS NOX "|*
—~———— .~~-M-n-A__. ——-»%»$g§s;;;;;; ;E»ss~s~-» .w-UTZTiTNTTTT*****
.3 VZ. _;;` M ;;; __ ;r ..rr. J; n P'- Er TQE--.-Q;¤ -.-Q;¤
"~_;;;=. ls, -ili -il? -ili rf -;€ VJ rf -Q€ _,Cj _,Cj .,jj .,jj 2; _gr;A-5L;.-7;;.:-5=;;r;;;-j=;r;;_'-
3i;?ET;""+**+>+e+=ae+ea++ee++eee+>=C··aa··»;~;»»—»·......IiI;{;ffi1l€¥ifi{iL;$;$;s ;§s§:}$;é?¥?iEééééééE;EEEEEEEEEEEESEQ;%%%¥;¥¥¥¥#$#i¥i;LEFE
- nlli
H ``--

Iw`"'iT""""__"'I`" """ ****‘“‘“‘ I I—-—-·--II-— I~»---·->s....I.-..`I.1....;...1)1 ~_I_
Case 2:92-cv—OO 15I§’CD Document 158 Filed 06/(%8j Pag 2 of 4 I
I ) I I I
I I
I I
I I
I
CERTIFICATION I
This is t certify that a copy of the fo »qFing his been I
II I I
hand—delivered and/or mailed, postage prepaid, uhis 8qIday of
I I
I I
June, 2004, to the following counsel of recor• I
John R. Willia s, Esquire I I
Williams & Pat is, LLC I
51 Elm Street I
New Haven, CT 6510 I
I
~ I
Patrick G. Ala'r, Esquire I I
Office of the orporation Counsel I I
Town of West H rtford I I
50 South Main treet I I
West Hartford, CT 06107 I I
I I
[ I rg III I I
I ` iugim
Nicole D. l%}"an I
I I
I
I
~ I
I I
I I
I
I I
` I
I I
I
I I
I I
- 2 - I
I
I
Acx, svscron Ann mnsrsu, u.r· · ATTORNEYS ·II - I I
836 FARMQNGT N AVE., SUITE 221·WEST HARTFORD, CT 06119-1544•(860) 233- URIS NO.I
es»————- ——~—————-- IvW·"""—T*I+"*—_""““T

1 I ‘ I I
Case 2:92-cv-OO 1il—EICD D0cument158 Filed 06/(IB! Pad 3of4
j I
I
I
I
c • NNEcr1cUT GENERAL STATUTES SEC n, _;I_ I 7-10 I
In consid-ring the circumstances with wh`IIIthe oIficers I
were confronte•, you may consider their duty Ilwrotecl person;
. . , I , I I l
and property i· the vicinity of Summit Women’— ulnter It the time
II *
of the protest-. Connecticut General Statute~ ewction 7-108 I
I I!
provides that . municipality is liable for inj ·Ies cafsed by In
act of violenc— of any person or persons whil=IIImembeI of, orI
acting in conc-rt with, any mob, riotous asse hl; or aIsembly df
persons engage• in disturbing the public peac=IIIf theI I
I I
municipality on its police or other proper au l»~itiesIhave noI
I I . lll!
exercised reas•nable care or diligence in the •¤wyenti$n or I
II I
suppression of such mob, riotous assembly or .L¢wmblyIIngage il
disturbing the public peace. III I
A “mob” is an assembly of people defying IT law; A “mobI
I
is an assembla•e of persons excited or incite•I»m acti$n, havipg
thrown restraint to the winds, reckless and h==!Iong iI their I
II I
unlawful desi ns, determined to brook no oppo-I»·on t©Itheir I
II . I . I
common purpos , and ordinarily characterized •, noisy =nd IlOC+US
disturbance o? the public peace and order. II I I
I

II 836 .:A.:.M.NG-I $$$ET,iZ§€Z§?wE$%X°£r?§g§g%I§§?gt1€m°33'>$Z§3 Un1sNo.I ·ma
E -*1 I?

I 7}
. I I I
Case 2:92-cv—00 1<4——I§CD Document 158 Filed 06/06/ Pag 4 of 4
I I I I
I I I
I
I
I I
I I
A “riotous assembly” is a disturbance of IIW pea¢P by thrie
or more people who execute an act, legal or 1 Hemel, 1I a viOl%nt
and turbulent anner. III I I
I
An “asse ly engaged in disturbing the p . Ig peaIe” is aI
I I
I II I ¤ =
disturbance in which two or more persons act ` uoncerj to I
I
disturb the pu lic peace. I I
I
I I

I
I
I
c.G.s. § 7-108 I
I
I
Sestito v. Gro on, 178 Conn. 520, 524-25 (197•I II I
I
Barbour Packa Store, Inc. v. Hartford, 30 C•i| Suppj 64 (19I2)
I I I I
Maus v. Cit of Salina, 154 Kan. 38, 114 P.2d :nm, 810I(1941) I
I I
m I

I
I I
I I
- 2 -
Acx, svscron Ann KARSTEN, I.I.I¤ ·Arron~.·svsA - I ~ I
836 FAFIMINGT N AVE., SUITE 221·WEST HARTFORD. CT 061‘I9»1544•(860) 233- 5 URIS NO. I5 ?76 I
I I "`"“III` II I