Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 47.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 3, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 440 Words, 2,926 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/23814/282.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Arizona ( 47.2 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Arizona

I E —’¥’¢ iQ ; A
2 3 A . L \
IN THE UNITED
3 ‘~ .·1:—;j CEA
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
4
Erchonia Medical, Inc., et al. )
5 )
Plaintiffs, ) _ Nu. CIV 02-2036-PHX-MHM
-
v. l
7* 1
Robert E. Moroney, LLC, et al. )
S ) ORDER
Defendants. )
9 -————————-———§
l 10 Erchonia Medical,.Inc. et al. )
1
11 Plaintiffs, )
12 v. E
13 Robert E. Moroney, LLC, et al. ‘ `
14 D efendants.

15 )
Robert E. Moroney, LLC, et al. g ’
16
Plaintiffs, )
17 )
v. · )
13 }
Erchonia Medical, Inc., et al. g
19
Defendants. )
20
21
Upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing,
1 22
IT IS ORDERED, ADIUDGED AND DECREED that the following claims be
23
dismissed with prejudice:
24
1. Robert E. Moroney LLC's and Robert E. Moroney‘s (collectively "REM")
25
Second Claim forRelief for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage,
26
Third Claim for Relief for defamation, Fourth Claim for Relief for business
27
disparagementftrade libel and Fifth Claim for Relief for aidingand abetting tortious
28
conduct all raised against Erchonia Medical, Inc. ("Erchonia"), Steven and Debbie Sue
Shanks, George and Gina Leger, a.nd Kevin and Carolyn Tucek. REM‘s First Claim for
Case 2:O2-cv—O2036-I\/IHI\/I Document 282 Filed 08/O3/2005 Page 1 of 2

1 Relief for false advertising is limited to the Leger shock hazard memo and its Seventh
2 Claim for Relief for violation of Arizona's Consumer Fraud Act is limited to Erchonia's.
3 sale of Biocleanse footbath products to REM and the Leger shock hazard memo.
4 2. Erchonia's- First Dlaim for Relief for trade secret misappropriation and
5 Seventh Claim for Relief for.]-,anham Act unfair competition against REM.
` 6 IT IS ALSO ORDERED,ADJUDGED AND DECREED that George Leger shall
7 remain bound by the Preliminary Injunction is sued in this action and shall be b ound by any
S injunction issued against Erchonia concerning the George Leger memo, as if he were a
9 person acting in concert with Erchonia.
10 ITIS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUD GED AND DECREED that each party shall
11 bear its own costs and attorneys' fees afociated with the above—stated causes of action.
I2 DONE and ORDERED this _L;_ clay of ___Lg;\;b;\;, 2005.
13
BY THE COURT:
14 -
15 l
16 ITIBEEYE H ary — . M_ “””‘ ‘“"“‘
United Sta s District l‘ udge
17
_ 18 msssi-vwtznotmeswmpasea Jcagmmm ssp si naman re shim si naps
19
20
21
22
23 I
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:O2-cv—O2036-I\/IHI\/I Document 282 Filed 08/O3/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02036-MHM

Document 282

Filed 08/03/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02036-MHM

Document 282

Filed 08/03/2005

Page 2 of 2