Free Supplement - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I Lynn M. laney. .lr..
Arizona State Bar # l084
2 934 VK -·‘’ . McDowell Road
Phoenix. Arixona S500?-I Tt`30
A 'lel: {602) 254-7600
l·`ax: (602) 252-7225
-1 Email:@j;j_f:__i&t]vt_cst.a1et
Attorney lor Plaintiff
(1
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
s
DISTRICT OP ARIZONA
v
2 I ')_") "} _ F 1
IU Kenneth A. Batory, NO CT O` `O`6 PHX JT 5
rl Plaintiff: CITATION OF SUPPLEIVIENTAL
VS AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF
I2 I RESPONSE TO IVIOTION TO
U Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York COMPEL (dkt'# 55 I
M Corporation, dba *‘The Great lndoors,"
15 Defendant.
lh
it
is
l°" PlaintiffBatory, by Lynn. M. Laney, his undersigned attorney,
Q" provides the following citation ofauthority to supplement his ‘°Response in
il Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Enforce Oral Settlement Agreement
22 (dkt. #52), and Motion for Sanctions", dkt. #55.
24 The following new Sec. 2(D) should be added:
if D. The District Court Cannot Enforce an Almost Completed Settlement
is
u
Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS Document 57 Filed O3/19/2007 Page 1 0f3

l ln Mgynard v. City ofSan Jose, 37 F. 3d 1396. 1401 (9m Cir. 1994).
2 the Ninth Circuit said;
ii *‘Further, the district court properly declined to
4 enforce the agreement. `“[T]he district court may
enforce only comp/ere settlement agreements.”`
5 QM/ie. @29 l~`.2d at 890. After reviewing the
6 correspondence between the parties and hearing
from the attorneys involved in the settlement
7 agreements, the court concluded that the parties
S never completed the settlement agreement.
Although the attorneys left the March 4 settlement
" conference believing they would work out the final
In language ofthe City Manager's letter. they were not
able to do so."
it
12
is
I4 Rl€SPEC'l`FULl.Y SUBlVlIT”l`HD this l9[l` day ofl\/{arch,
15 2007.
l(¤
is
is A
IL) -'r//II '-E ‘
`Mf*"m 7//are - MZ/}7l@‘l
Eta fx ` `? ` (H tp ·
l.ymi‘l\/1. laney. .lr.
El Attorney lor l’laintiff
24
26
28 Q
Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS Document 57 Filed O3/19/2007 Page 2 of 3

I
2 ORIGINAL document filed clcctronically
_ By transmission lo the Clcrk`s Office of
_ 'lhc U.S. District Court. District ot`Ari7or1a
4 19h day oi`Ma1rch. 2002
and t0 thc i`DiiL`]\-Xiillg CM,-*"ljCF rcgistrants:
-Al\§D-
(1
T A courtesy copy nmiled this
l 19m day of Mairch. 2007 to:
8
J, Mark Ogdcn
" R. Shaiwi·1 Ollcr
Littler Mcndclson. l’.(T.
IU C"z1mclLvz1ck|Tsplz1nadc
II 2425 li, (`;‘11ncIback Rd.. Suitc 900
Phocnix. Arizona 85016
I2 ,¤\t1orncys for Defendant
is -.-’\Nl)-
I4
A courtesy copy mailcd this
H 19m da-1}-‘ of`\Az1rch. 2007 to:
](1 , ._ _
Hon. John \\-’. Scdwick
H ILS. District Court-Phoenix
410 W. Washiiigton S1.
18 l’Iioc1ix-.¤\i·i;;ona 8500”
Y z
ri (,irJ02»¢c2é’f`c
2 U i·‘\1‘lcnca1 Marti n
2I
22
24
20
22
28 l
L1
Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS Document 57 Filed O3/19/2007 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS

Document 57

Filed 03/19/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS

Document 57

Filed 03/19/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS

Document 57

Filed 03/19/2007

Page 3 of 3