Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I I.-ynn M. Laney, Jr.,
Arizona State Bar It 1084
2 934 W. McDowell Road
Phoenix. Arizona 85007-1730
3 Tel: (602) 254-Y600
Fax: (602) 252-7225
4 Attorney for Plaintiff
(1
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
s
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
0
In Kenneth A- Bamrys NO. CV 02-2026 PHXJWS
H Plaintiff, MOTION FOR EXTENSION
VS OF TIME FOR RESPONSE TO
I2 ` DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
Iii Scars, Roebuck and Co., a New York ON
M Corporation, dba "The Great Indoors," ` Q I
I5 Defendant.
to
tr
Plaintiff, Kenneth A. Batory, ("Batory") by his undersigned attorney
ia
of record moves for an order extending the due date for his response to the
19
Defendanfs Motion for Reconsideration from November 8, 2006, to
20
November I3, 2006.
2I
22 1. Aura ioarrv Fora exreusiou
23
M The extension requested herein is sought pursuant to Federal Rules of
2, Civil Procedure Rule 6(b) and U.S. District Court of Arizona I- R Civ.
26 7.3(a).
2t
28
1
Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS Document 46 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 1 0f3

n
2 2. PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
3 On October I2, 2006, the Court filed an order denying the
4 Defendant’s (‘°Sears") Motion for Summary Judgment (to compel
5 arbitration_). Dkt. #4}. On October 23, 2006, Sears filed a Motion for
° Reconsideration pursuant to L R Civ. 7.2(g). Dkt. # 44. On October 24,
i 2006, the Court issued an Order directing Batory to file a response tothe
** Motion for Reconsideration within fifteen days from that date (by
" November 8, 2006). Dkt. # 45.
lll
" 3. REASONS FOR REQ QUESTED EXTENSION
'2 The undersigned is a seventy-five year old semi-retired sole
li practitioner, with only a part-time secretary.
M Because the undersigned believes that the Motion for Reconsideration
*5 mis-states both the record before the Court and the law, it is taking longer
I6 than anticipated to finish researching and drafting Batory’s response,
I? particularly with the deadlines in other cases that I must meet.
is
'° 4. VERIFICATION BY COUNSEL
EU Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. I746, I verily and declare under penalty of
if perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct.
22 Executed this Sm day of November, 2006.
24 \ js * _ nl nf
25 K/tr 1/,; -[.», ,-/I ··‘`` , I .€..»;—§;
2T Attorney for Plaintiff
zx 2
Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS Document 46 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 2 of 3

I 5. CONCLUSION
_ Based upon the foregoing, the undersigned respectfully requests
1
approval of the order granting the extension to November 13, 2006
4
requested herein lodged concurrently with this Motion pursuant to L R Civ.
5 7. 1 (bis.
6
1
8 By/s Lynn M. Laney, Jr.
Lynn M. Laney, Jr.
9 Attorney for Plaintiff
1 I
i ORIGINAL document filed electronically
ll By transmission to the Clerl<‘s Office of
12 The U.S. District Court, District ofArizona
Sth day of November, 2006
'3 and to the following CM/ECF registrants:
14
J. Mark Ogden
'5 R. Shawn Oller
,6 Littler Mcndelson, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
ir
*8 -AND-
li, A courtesy copy mailed this
Sm day of November, 2006 to:
20
2I Hon. John W. Sedwick
U.S. District Court-Phoenix
22 410 w. washington st.
2;, Phoenix, Arizona 85003
24 By s/Arlenea Martin
26
zs __
Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS Document 46 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 3 013

Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS

Document 46

Filed 11/08/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS

Document 46

Filed 11/08/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02026-JWS

Document 46

Filed 11/08/2006

Page 3 of 3