Free Stipulation - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 76.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 546 Words, 3,445 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/23980/248-1.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Arizona ( 76.2 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Arizona
1 LAW OFFICE
STUART]. REILLY, P.C.
2 PO Box 80410
Phoenix, Arizona 85060-0410
3 Telephone: 602/ 912-9200
4 E—mail: [email protected]
Smart Reilly, #005275
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 .
Stuart J. Reilly, )
1() ) Case No. CIV 02-2218 PHX BTM
Plaintiff, )
11 )
vs. ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND
12 ) TIME TO SUBMIT PROPOSED
13 Charles M. Brewer, Ltd. Profit Sharing Plan ) PRETRIAL ORDER
and Trust, a retirement plan; Charles M. )
14 Brewer, Ltd. Restated Pension Plan, a )
retirement plan; and Charles M. Brewer, )
is >
Defendants. )
16 1
)
17 )
18 )
19 Plaintiff has sold his home and he is presently in the midst of packing and preparing for
20 the move from his residence/office. Due to scheduling beyond Plaintiff` s control, the move
21 will take place on March 1, 2006 and Plaintiff will require one week to reestablish his office.
22 During this time it will be very difficult for Plaintiff to make the necessary contribution to the
23 final pretrial order. Because the trial is set for April 18, 19 and 20, a reasonable continuance of
24 the date for submitting the pretrial Order and the pretrial conference should not impair the trial
25 date. The continuance will give all parties sufficient time to collaborate on the pretrial order.
26
-1-
sTu>utATIoN
Ca 9 2:O2—cv—O2218—BTI\A€}`ii]SI§V`Cli5Bobi1DmPgHil2§|lJ8ARINGI*Pii$d'0`@2l§72i30l6AL Page 1 of 3

1 THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the parties, that the
2 dates for the submission of the pretrial order and the pretrial conference may be continued
3 fourteen (14) days.
4 SIGNED this 28th day of February 2006.
5 STUART J. REILLY, P.C.
6
7 s/ Stuart J Reilly
Stuart J. Reilly
8 Attomey for Plaintiff
9 REISH LUFTMAN REICHER & COHEN
10
11 s/ Stuart J Reilly for Michael Vanic, Esq.
Michael Vanic, Esq.
12 Attorney for Brewer Defendants
13
14
15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
16 I hereby certify that on February 28, 2006, I electronically transmitted the attached document to
the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of
17 Electronic Filing to be electronically mailed to:
18 Ed Hendricks, Esq.
Michael K. Dana, Esq.
19 MEYER HENDRICKS PLLC
20 3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85012
21 _ _
Michael Vanic, Esq.
22 C. Frederick Reish, Esq.
REISH LUFTMAN REICHER & COHEN
23 11755 Wilshire Blvd., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90025-1539
24
-2-
STIPULATION
Ca 9 2;02-cv-0221 8-BT|\ll§IilSPV`ClliJ$obT1.?rrli5%liIl2SZl8`RING|i2il€El@5/EBJ/ETODEAL Page 2 of 3

1 Courtesy copy of the attached document and the proposed order e-mailed this 28th day of
2 February 2006 to:
3 Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz
United States District Court
4 5160 Courthouse
940 Front Street
5 San Diego, CA 92101
6 s/ Marisa J Reilly
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
STIPULATION
Ca 9 2:02-cv-0221 8—BT|\ll}1%`F’V‘ C‘T1‘>Bob1Pni)513'1‘E§f§““NC1*°iLréE1”6`@§‘E%l§T®0T6AL Page 3 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 248

Filed 02/28/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 248

Filed 02/28/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-02218-BTM-LSP

Document 248

Filed 02/28/2006

Page 3 of 3