Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation regarding Briefing Schedule re Renewed Motion 15 for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or 16 Remittitur [Doc. No. 257], and for good cause shown, 17 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until December 22, 2005 to respond to 18 Defendants' Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the alternative, Motion 19 for a New Trial and/or Remittitur. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall thereafter have until January 20, 21 2006 to reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Renewed Motion for Judgment as a 22 Matter of Law or, in the alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or Remittitur. 23 24 DATED this 30th day of November, 2005. 25 26 27 28
Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM Document 258 Filed 12/02/2005 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brett D. LEAVEY, Plaintiff, vs. UNUM/PROVIDENT CORP., et al., Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CIV 02-2281-PHX-SMM ORDER