1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNUM/PROVIDENT CORP. et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM Document 240 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Brett D. LEAVEY, Plaintiff, vs.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CIV 02-2281-PHX-SMM ORDER
Having considered Defendants' Motion to Exceed Page Limit for their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or Remittitur [Doc. No. 237] and Plaintiff's Response to the Motion [Doc. No. 238], and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall be permitted to exceed the 17-page limit of Local Rule 7.2(e) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona by 9 pages, for a total length of 26 pages for Defendants' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or Remittitur. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall likewise be permitted to exceed the 17-page limit for his Response to Defendants' Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter // //
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
of Law, or in the alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or Remittitur, for a total length of 26 pages.
DATED this 14th day of November, 2005.
-2Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM Document 240 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 2 of 2