Free Stipulation - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 10.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 460 Words, 2,780 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/24041/257.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Arizona ( 10.5 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5

Thomas L. Hudson, 014485 Danielle D. Janitch, 021838 OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2794 [email protected] [email protected] (602) 640-9000 Attorneys for Plaintiff

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM Document 257 Filed 11/28/2005 Page 1 of 2
1123305

Stephen M. Bressler, 009032 Ann-Martha Andrews, 012616 Scott M. Bennett, 022350 Lewis and Roca LLP 40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4429 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (602) 262-5747 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Brett D. Leavey, Plaintiff, vs. UNUMProvident Corporation and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV-02-2281 PHX SMM STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL AND/OR REMITTITUR (First Request) (Assigned to the Honorable Stephen M. McNamee)

The undersigned parties, by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate that 1. Plaintiff may have an extension of time, up to and including December

22, 2005, within which to respond to Defendants' Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, In the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or Remittitur. The current date for filing a response is December 12, 2005, so this enlarges the date by

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ten days. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension, and is made due to the schedule of Plaintiff's counsel. 2. Defendants' reply in support of Defendants' Renewed Motion for

Judgment as a Matter of Law or, In the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial and/or Remittitur shall be due on or before January 20, 2006. DATED this 28th day of November, 2005. OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. By s/ Danielle D. Janitch Thomas L. Hudson Danielle D. Janitch 2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2794 Steven C. Dawson, 006674 Anita Rosenthal, 006199 DAWSON & ROSENTHAL, P.C. 6586 Highway 179, Suite B-2 Sedona, Arizona 86351 Gregg H. Temple, 009866 GREGG H. TEMPLE, P.C. 11801 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 247 Phoenix, Arizona 85028 Attorneys for Plaintiff LEWIS AND ROCA, LLP By s/ Stephen M. Bressler Stephen M. Bressler Ann-Martha Andrews Scott Michael Bennett 40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4429 Attorneys for Defendants I hereby certify that on November 28, 2005, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing. s/ Lindsay B. Jensen

Case 2:02-cv-02281-SMM

Document 257 2 Filed 11/28/2005

Page 2 of 2