Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1
2
3
4
N
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9 Barbara Booth, No. CV-03-l621—PHX—ROS
10 Plaintiff, ORDER
l l vs.
12 _
13 gvéest Communications International, Inc., I
14 Defendants.
15
16 The Court received a letter from Plaintiff Barbara Booth on August 26, 2005.
17 Defendant does not appear to have been sewed with a copy. Because the Local Rules do not
1 8 allow for _e_,_>; pag communications with the Court, the letter is being dispatched to Defendant
19 along with this Order. g LRCiv. 83.2(d), incorporating Arizona Rules of Professional
20 Conduct Rule 3.5.1 If Booth would like the Court to reconsider its decision, she must tile
21 a motion to reconsider under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
22 Accordingly, -
23 IT IS ORDERED that a copy of this Order with a copy of the attached letter shall be
24 provided to counsel for all parties.
25
26 ‘Arizona Rule of Professional Conduct 3.5(b) provides that a lawyer shall not
27 communicate g tg with a judge except as permitted by law. This rule also applies to pro
se litigants. §_e_e King v. Atyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987) (pro se litigants must
28 follow the rules of procedure governing all litigants).
Case 2:03-cv—O1621-ROS Document 46 Filed O9/O1/2005 Page 1 of 2

1 .
2
3 DATED {31 A0? .
4 .
5 é ·! 9
6 Ros . ` 1* I
7 United States District Judge
8
9
10
ll
12
13
I4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 I
22
23
24
25
26 I
27
28
- 2 -
Case 2:03-cv—O1621-ROS Document 46 Filed O9/O1/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01621-ROS

Document 46

Filed 09/01/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01621-ROS

Document 46

Filed 09/01/2005

Page 2 of 2