Free Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 44.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 27, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 391 Words, 2,522 Characters
Page Size: 610.56 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35233/53.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona ( 44.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona
ppyézwffw
` i=ii.rai:>
I Ei;) __ F ,______ i._QgG*¤·~
‘ -. TTI ._ ..___ RECEIVED COPVED
1
LLC? _·,-;;,;f SEP 362995
2 I I ` (-·
MARK SATHER _ “LE"**§ U S Ulsrniem .
3 r>LAu~mi=i= Pno sa I . . I ev B"“"'*"`*" ‘*""°**1!_2¤i$)rI€mT
3715 S. Dorsey Lane P 1..‘111".‘‘ EEPU
4 Tem , Arizona 85282 "" ‘
(480§>g31-5339
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9 Mark Sather,
10 Plaintiff, Case No.: CIV—03—2195-PHX-EHC
vs.
11
John Potter Postmaster General, United PLMNTITIFPS MOTION T0 EXCEED
12 _ PAGE LIMIT
States Postal Service,
13
14 Defendant
15 Plaintiff, by and through as the undersigned Plaintiff Pro Se, hereby moves the
16 Court for an Order allowing Plaintiff to tile its Controverting Statement of Facts in
17
18 Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs Response in
19 Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, both of which exceed the
20 page iimit set forth in Local Rule 1.10 (e).
21
22 Mamgmnogm
23
24 . . .
Because of the number and importance of the opposing legal issues raised by
25
26 the Plaintiffs Controverting Statement of Facts in Opposition to Defendants Motion for
27 Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for
28 Summary Judgment, it is necessary to tile plaintiffs Controverting Statement of Facts in
Case 2:03-cv-02195-EHC Document 53 Filed O9/26/2005 Page 1 of2

1
2 . . . . .
Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs Response in
3
4 Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment both of which exceed the
5 page limit set forth in Local Rule 1.10 (e).
6
7
8
9 Respectfully submitted this / day of July, 2005
10
ATHE
11 PLAINTIFF PRO SE
3715 S. Dorsey Lane
12 Tempe, Arizona 85282
(480) 831-5339
13
14 "
(P
15 ·- - - — / t/a/
Original tiled and copy of the foregoing mailed this day of , 2005
16 102
17 Paul K. Charlton
United States Attorney
18 District of Arizona
19 Harriet Bernick
20 Assistant U.S. Attomey
Two Renaissance Square
21 40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
22 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-5001
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case 2:03-cv-02195-EHC Document 53 Filed O9/26/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02195-EHC

Document 53

Filed 09/26/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02195-EHC

Document 53

Filed 09/26/2005

Page 2 of 2