1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M eadowlark Lemon, a married man, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs have filed a M otion for Change of F irm N ame (Doc. #145). Because the motion does not seek to change attorneys, only the name of their law firm, a motion is not required. Notice will suffice. See Local Rule of Civil Procedure 83.3. The Court will treat Plaintiffs' motion as a notice of change of firm name and will otherwise deny the motion as moot. IT IS THEREFO RE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' M otion for Change of Firm Name (Doc. #145) is denied. DATED this 17th day of August, 2005. ) ) Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, ) ) vs. ) ) Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc.,) et al., ) ) D efendant s /Counterclaimants. ) ) No. CV-04-0299-PHX-DGC CV-04-1023-PHX-DGC IN THE UNITED S TATES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DIS TRICT OF ARIZONA
ORDER
Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC
Document 146
Filed 08/17/2005
Page 1 of 1