Free Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Meritage Homes Corporation, a Maryland Corporation, formerly d/b/a Meritage Corporation, Case No. CV-04-0384-PHX-ROS Hancock-MTH Builders, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Hancock-MTH Communities, Inc., an PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING Arizona corporation, and currently d/b/a Meritage MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE Homes Construction, Inc., an Arizona corporation, LIMITS IN PLAINTIFFS' and Meritage Homes of Arizona, Inc., an Arizona RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT corporation, GREG HANCOCK'S UPDATED MOTION FOR SUMMARY Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT OR DISMISSAL v. Ricky Lee Hancock and Brenda Hancock, husband and wife; Gregory S. Hancock and Linda Hancock, husband and wife, Rick Hancock Homes L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; RLH Development, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; and J2H2, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Defendants. Rick and Brenda Hancock, Defendants, Counter-Claimants, and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. Meritage Homes Corporation, a Maryland Corporation, formerly d/b/a Meritage Corporation, Hancock-MTH Builders, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Hancock-MTH Communities, Inc., an Arizona Corporation; and currently d/b/a Meritage Homes Construction, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, and Meritage Homes of Arizona, Inc., an Arizona Corporation; Steven J. Hilton and Suzanne Hilton, husband and wife; John R. Landon and Debi Landon, husband and wife; Scott Keeffe and Vicky Keeffe, husband and wife; Roger Zetah and Jane

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 431-2

Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Doe Zetah, husband and wife; and James Arneson and Zane Arneson, husband and wife, Third Party Defendants. Having read the Motion to Exceed Page Limits in Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Greg Hancock's Updated Motion for Summary Judgment or Dismissal, and good causing appearing, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs may file their Response to Defendant Greg Hancock's Updated Motion for Summary Judgment or Dismissal, in a number of pages not to exceed 24 in length.
1958198.1

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 431-22 - Filed 02/23/2007

Page 2 of 2