Free Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Dan W. Goldfine (#018788) Adam Lang (#022545) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. One Arizona Center 400 East Van Buren Street Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Telephone: (602) 382-6000 Facsimile: (602) 382-6070 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants and Third Party Defendants and

8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

Grant Woods, Esq. (#006106) GRANT WOODS, P.C. 1726 North Seventh Street Phoenix, Arizona 85006 Telephone: (602) 258-2599 Facsimile: (602) 258-5070 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants and Third Party Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Meritage Homes Corporation, a Maryland Corporation, formerly d/b/a Meritage Corporation, Case No. CV-04-0384-PHX-ROS Hancock-MTH Builders, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Hancock-MTH Communities, Inc., an MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE Arizona corporation, and currently d/b/a Meritage LIMITS IN PLAINTIFFS' Homes Construction, Inc., an Arizona corporation, RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT and Meritage Homes of Arizona, Inc., an Arizona GREG HANCOCK'S UPDATED corporation, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, v. Ricky Lee Hancock and Brenda Hancock, husband and wife; Gregory S. Hancock and Linda Hancock, husband and wife, Rick Hancock Homes L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; RLH Development, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; and J2H2, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Defendants.

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 431

Filed 02/23/2007

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

Rick and Brenda Hancock, Defendants, Counter-Claimants, and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. Meritage Homes Corporation, a Maryland Corporation, formerly d/b/a Meritage Corporation, Hancock-MTH Builders, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Hancock-MTH Communities, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, an Arizona Corporation; and currently d/b/a Meritage Homes Construction, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, and Meritage Homes of Arizona, Inc., an Arizona Corporation; Steven J. Hilton and Suzanne Hilton, husband and wife; John R. Landon and Debi Landon, husband and wife; Scott Keeffe and Vicky Keeffe, husband and wife; Roger Zetah and Jane Doe Zetah, husband and wife; and James Arneson and Zane Arneson, husband and wife, Third Party Defendants. Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court for permission to file Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Greg Hancock's Updated Motion for Summary Judgment or Dismissal ("Motion") in a number of pages exceeding the presumptive limit of seventeen (17) pages pursuant to LRCiv. 7.2(e).1 Under Rule 7.2(e), "[u]nless otherwise permitted by the Court . . . the response including its supporting memorandum . . . shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages, exclusive of attachments and any required statement of facts." Plaintiffs respectfully request leave to file their Response in a length not exceeding 24 pages despite the rule's presumptive 17-page limit. Substantial discovery has been taken in this matter ­ more than 30,000 documents have been produced, at least 33 depositions have been conducted, and dozens of declarations have been prepared in this lawsuit. Arising from this discovery is a multitude of facts. For example, although not even the universe of material facts in this lawsuit, the Motion contains 78 separate paragraphs of statement of facts; Plaintiffs' responsive statement of facts totals 127 separate paragraphs (in addition to 78 paragraphs of
1

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

Although the Court's February 6, 2007 Amended Rule Scheduling Order is silent on the number of pages a party may file in response to a summary judgment motion, it does set the presumptive limit on original motions to seventeen (17) pages.
Document 431- 2 - Filed 02/23/2007 Page 2 of 4

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

objections). Accordingly, there are many "facts" to oppose, respond, and controvert. This does not even take into account the complex issues surrounding unfair competition, usurpation of corporation opportunities, and the other areas of the law that are discussed in the Motion and require a thorough response from Plaintiffs. Further, the approach that defendant Greg Hancock takes forces Plaintiffs' hands. The Motion consists of paragraphs upon paragraphs of misstatements of law and the factual record, out-of-context or misquoted testimony, and unsupported assertions. Accordingly, Plaintiffs, in order to fully and thoroughly respond to Greg Hancock's assertions in the Motion, will require more than the presumptive number of pages provided by Rule 7.2(e). Plaintiffs have done everything they can to present a succinct and clear Response in light of the approach taken in the Motion. Therefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court allow them to file their Response in opposition to the Motion in a number of pages not to exceed 24 in length. DATED this 23rd day of February, 2007. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

By s/ Dan W. Goldfine Dan W. Goldfine Adam Lang One Arizona Center Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Third Party Defendants and

By s/ Grant Woods Grant Woods GRANT WOODS, P.C. 1726 North Seventh Street Phoenix, AZ 85006 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Third Party Defendants

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 431- 3 - Filed 02/23/2007

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 23, 2007, I electronically transmitted the foregoing document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Ivan K. Mathew Mathew & Mathew, P.C. 3300 North Central Avenue, Suite 1730 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Attorneys for Defendants Rick Hancock, Brenda Hancock, Rick Hancock Homes, L.L.C., and RLH Development, L.L.C. Robert M. Frisbee Frisbee & Bostock, PLC 1747 East Morton Avenue Suite 108 Phoenix AZ 85020 Attorneys for Defendant Greg Hancock Kenneth J. Sherk Timothy J. Burke Fennemore Craig, P.C. 3003 N. Central Ave. Suite 2600 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2913 Attorneys for Defendant Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P. in State Court Action s/ Becky Kinningham
1958312.1

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

Case 2:04-cv-00384-ROS

Document 431- 4 - Filed 02/23/2007

Page 4 of 4