this IJOI.I;:»II;>1 I5 &);i_IN PROPER FORM ACCORDING
'|II@1I'I·N@£·I8‘|.I8HTTD to rspsm ANDIOR tow. Rutss mm mtcncss
l.l¤'II\¤|I¤AI.I¥A8 I=IE¤um¤¤· svn! AND IS swam I _ mos Ymscovizt.
BITNET G AIIZIINS ADMINISTRATIVE REFERENCE
POLICIES AIID PROCEDURES MANUAL ‘ _ u,_uIcNmb¤IS°cumI
Il I Law Offices (SPACE BELOW PROVIDED FOR FILING STAMP ONLYI
FLYNN at STILLMAN
2 224 Birmingham Drive, Suite IA4 _'
c diff,C I'f mi szouv
I" IBB; 'zéaim EP _. L¤¤¤¤¤
3 ___ RECEIVED ___ COPY
4 I=IIII.II= I-I. stII.I.IvII¤II~.I. California sms Bar III 152861 `
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM FOREMAN [Local Counsel) 0 2
5 7272 East Indian School Road, Suite 203 CLERK LI S DISTRICT COURT
Scottsdale, AZ 85251 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
6 I’*S°’ °‘“‘â€Â°Â° A B" . II2.
7 WILLIAM FOREMAN, Arizona Bar # 010617
_ .. 8 Attorneys for plaintiff, DAVID T. BRAUNSTEIN - . ’ I ‘
9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ‘
IO FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
11
12 DAVID T. BRA_UNSTEIN I CASE NO.: CV 04-0401 PHX (NVWI ·
I
Plaintiff, I NOTICE OF ORDERING REPORTER'S
I3 I TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
s. I
1 4 V I
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ; CHARLES I
15 SMITH, an individual; DARCY A. CEROW, an I
individual; U.S. DEPARTMENT OFIUSTICE I
I6 and DOES 1 through 20 inclusive, I
I
I 7 Defendants. I
I
18 I I
T9 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE tl·Iat appellant David T. Braunstein orders the following transcripts:
20 (1) May 13, 2005 Hearing on Defendants motions to dismiss and/or forsummary judgment. I-
ZI I I W NF Respectfully Submitted,
22 FLYNN & STILLMAN
23 . ; _
Dated: Iuly 29, 2005 :
24 __ Philip H. Stillman, Esq. _
25 Attorneys for plaintiff David Braunstein
26 I
27
28 I I
— Case 2:04-cv—OO401-NVW Document 68 Filed O9/O2/2005 Page I of 1
Case 2:04-cv-00401-NVW
Document 68
Filed 09/02/2005
Page 1 of 1