> _, .
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D
AUG 2 2 2005
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT »·
°‘“‘“
DAVID T. BRAUNSTEIN, No. 05-16390
Plaintiff-Appellant, ‘ D.C. No. CV-04-00401-NVW
District of Arizona,
v. Phoenix
_ ii if wUNiHéi5i s*rAii§sâ€iiÂ¥osT;¤[i. `sieiiiiiire; ( if Y v` M1 *+0 T M s ` iiâ€` iiii ii"
et al., ORDER
Defendants-Appellees,
and
CHARLES SMITH, an individual,
Defendant. `
A review of this court’s docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for
this appealcremain due. Within 21 days after the filing date of this_order, appellant e
shall pay to the district court ithe $255.00 tihng anddocketing fees for this appeaI‘ ‘i " CT
and tile in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to
proceed in forma paiiperis. — _ `
Case 2:04-cv—OO401-NVW Document 67 Filed O9/O1/2005 Page 1 of 2
L
05- 1 6390 _ _
Failure to pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis shall .
result in the automatic dismissal ofthe appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute.
See 9th Cir. R. 42-l.
The briefing schedule previously established by the court on July 22, 2005
remains in effect.
For the Court
Eric O’Kelly
Motions Attorney/Deputy Clerk
9th Cir. R. 27-7
General Orders/Appendix A
S:\MOATT\Cirkords\0S.05\eo\05—16390.wpd 2
Case 2:O4—cv—OO401-NVW Document 67 Filed O9/O1/2005 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-00401-NVW
Document 67
Filed 09/01/2005
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-00401-NVW
Document 67
Filed 09/01/2005
Page 2 of 2