Free Objection - District Court of California - California


File Size: 52.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 9, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 368 Words, 2,336 Characters
Page Size: 616.32 x 793.44 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196010/22.pdf

Download Objection - District Court of California ( 52.3 kB)


Preview Objection - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04765-CRB

Document 22

Filed 11/09/2007

Page 1 of 2

Matthew S. Hale, Es HALE & ASSOCIA ES Calif. State Bar No. 136690 45 Rivermont Drive Newport News, VA 23601 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1951 Newport News, VA 23601

. !

7

8

/I

Telephone No. (757) 596-1143 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs, DAVID J. LEE and DANIEL R. LLOYD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID J. LEE, and DANIEL R. LLOYD, ) Case No*: C-07-4765 CRB ) as individuals and, on behalf of others 1 1 similarly situated, OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFFS TO DEFENDANTS AMERICAN Plaintiffs, EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED vs. SERVICES COMPANY INC. AND AMERICAN EXPRESS Y CENTURION BANK'S MOTION AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL ) TO DISMISS THE PLAINTIFFS' RELATED SERVICES, INC., a New York ) COMPLAINT corporation, AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, a Utah corporation, ) AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB, a DATE: November 30,2007 ) TIME: 10.00 a.m. Utah corporation, and DOES 1,through PLACE: Coprtroom 8 ) 100, inclusive, 1 9 ~Floor 450 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, Calf. 94102 Defendants.

1 1

David Lee, et al. vs. ~ m e r i c a n Express Travel Related Services. Inc.. et al. Opposition of Plaintiffs to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint

Case 3:07-cv-04765-CRB

Document 22

Filed 11/09/2007

Page 2 of 2

Plaintiffs, by their undersigned attorney, hereby oppose the Defendants' Motion t Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint on the bases that: (a) Plaintiffs have standing to maintain action and its various causes of action; (2) Plaintiffs' claims concerning their charge, credit, gift, and dining cards fall within the coverage of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civil Code

$9

1750 et sea.; (3) the Complaint meets the specificity requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b); and

(4) Plaintiff Daniel Lloyd's causes of action are not barred by the relevant statute of limitations.

The Court is respectfully referred to the accompanying memorandum of points and authorities in support of this Opposition. Dated: November 9,2007 Respectfully submitted,

z. l&
Matthew S. Hale Attorney for Plaintiffs David J. Lee and Daniel R. Lloyd

2

David Lee, et al. vs. American E x ~ r e s Travel Related Services, Inc,, et al. s Opposition of Plaintiffs to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint