Free Memorandum - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 17.8 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 6, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,008 Words, 5,921 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13506/449-9.pdf

Download Memorandum - District Court of Federal Claims ( 17.8 kB)


Preview Memorandum - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00720-GWM

Document 449-9

Filed 12/07/2007

Page 1 of 3

Exhibit E1 Post Suspension Profits Calculation Using the Court's Alternative Harvesting and Milling Schedule
FYE 3/31/97 Gross Profit * Deduct: Grindings By-Product Revenue * Add: Sale of Kettle to Stone Forest ** Deduct: Profits related to harvest of 618 mbf (LS) on Manaco per court's direction *** Total Present Value at 10/01/99 @ 6.17%**** Present Value at 10/01/98 @ 5.27%**** Present Value at 10/01/97 @ 5.57%**** Present Value at 10/01/96 @ 6.46%**** Present Value at 4/15/96 @ 6.75%**** * $ 1,406,022.82 (17,034.50) $ FYE 3/31/98 382,573.03 (11,933.75) 60,495.00 $ FYE 3/31/99 470,789.17 (14,017.25) $ FYE 3/31/00 3,053.60 (2,043.15) $ FYE 3/31/01 18,121.09 (3,500.50) Total $ 2,280,559.71 (48,529.15) 60,495.00

$ 1,388,988.32 $

431,134.28 $

(59,505.50) 397,266.42 $

1,010.45 $ $ $ $ $ $

14,620.59 13,770.92 13,081.53 12,391.33 11,639.42 11,290.14

(59,505.50) $ 2,233,020.06

$ 1,359,709.25 $ 1,318,905.61

$ 404,973.02 $ 392,820.15

$ 376,306.17 $ 353,471.88 $ 342,864.51

$ $ $ $

959.87 909.22 854.05 828.42

$ 2,066,708.82

Amounts are as set forth in PX 182, Ex 2 @ pages 20 - 22

** PX 182, EX 1 *** 80% of amounts shown on PX 182, Ex 2 at pg 13 of 22 as directed by the Court on pg 40 of its opinion. **** The rate used is the average yield of 10 year Treasury notes for the applicable period - See Ex E1a Note the profits for each Fiscal Year (April 1 - March 31) were discounted from the mid-point (Oct 1) of the Fiscal Year in which they were earned to the midpoint of the suspension period (April 15, 1996). This was done by discounting the profits for each fiscal year to the midpoint of the previous fiscal year (by making a net present value calculation as of that date using the average yield of 10 year Treasury notes for the year, See Ex E1a) and repeating the process until the present value as of April 15, 1996 was determined. The sum of present values of the profit earned on breached sales in each year of the post-suspension period equals the total net present value as of the midpoint of the suspension period of all profits earned on the breached sales in the post-suspension period. The profits for FYE 3/31/97 were earned after the lifting of the suspension on December 4, 1996. Therefore the mid-point of these profits for discounting purposes is February 1, 1997. Performing this discounting is absolutely required in order to properly carry out the order of the court to subtract dollars earned in one time period from lost profits incurred in another.

Tab E E1

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:98-cv-00720-GWM

Document 449-9

Filed 12/07/2007

Page 2 of 3

Exhibit E1a Post Suspension Profits - Yield on 10 Year Treasury Notes
Period From: To: Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Average Apr 96 Sep 96 Oct 96 Sep 97 6.53% 6.20% 6.30% 6.58% 6.42% 6.69% 6.89% 6.71% 6.49% 6.22% 6.30% 6.21% 6.46% Oct 97 Sep 98 6.03% 5.88% 5.81% 5.54% 5.57% 5.65% 5.64% 5.65% 5.50% 5.46% 5.34% 4.81% 5.57% Oct 98 Sep 99 4.53% 4.83% 4.65% 4.72% 5.00% 5.23% 5.18% 5.54% 5.90% 5.79% 5.94% 5.92% 5.27% Oct 99 Sep 00 6.11% 6.03% 6.28% 6.66% 6.52% 6.26% 5.99% 6.44% 6.10% 6.05% 5.83% 5.80% 6.17%

6.51% 6.74% 6.91% 6.87% 6.64% 6.83% 6.75%

Tab E E1a

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:98-cv-00720-GWM

Document 449-9

Filed 12/07/2007

Page 3 of 3

Exhibit E2 Post Suspension Profits Calculation Using a Corrected Alternative Harvesting and Milling Schedule
FYE 3/31/97 Gross Profit * Deduct: Grindings By-Product Revenue * Add: Sale of Kettle to Stone Forest ** Deduct: Profits related to harvest of 652 mbf (LS) on Manaco per court's direction *** Total Present Value at 10/01/99 @ 6.17%**** Present Value at 10/01/98 @ 5.27%**** Present Value at 10/01/97 @ 5.57%**** Present Value at 10/01/96 @ 6.46%**** Present Value at 4/15/96 @ 6.75%**** * $ 1,406,022.82 (17,034.50) $ FYE 3/31/98 382,573.03 (11,933.75) 60,495.00 $ FYE 3/31/99 470,789.17 (14,017.25) $ FYE 3/31/00 3,053.60 (2,043.15) $ FYE 3/31/01 18,121.09 (3,500.50) Total $ 2,280,559.71 (48,529.15) 60,495.00

$ 1,388,988.32 $

431,134.28 $

(63,224.60) 393,547.32 $

1,010.45 $ $ $ $ $ $

14,620.59 13,770.92 13,081.53 12,391.33 11,639.42 11,290.14

(63,224.60) $ 2,229,300.96

$ 1,359,709.25 $ 1,318,905.61

$ 404,973.02 $ 392,820.15

$ 372,783.29 $ 350,162.78 $ 339,654.71

$ $ $ $

959.87 909.22 854.05 828.42

$ 2,063,499.02

Amounts are as set forth in PX 182, Ex 2 @ pages 20 - 22

** PX 182, EX 1 *** 85% of amounts shown on PX 182, Ex 2 at pg 13 of 22. In the corrected Appendex A the volume not harvested on the Monaco Timber Sale is 652 MBF (LS). See Ex C2a of Tab C **** The rate used is the average yield of 10 year Treasury notes for the applicable period - See Ex E1a Note the profits for each Fiscal Year (April 1 - March 31) were discounted from the mid-point (Oct 1) of the Fiscal Year in which they were earned to the midpoint of the suspension period (April 15, 1996). This was done by discounting the profits for each fiscal year to the midpoint of the previous fiscal year (by making a net present value calculation as of that date using the average yield of 10 year Treasury notes for the year, See Ex E1a) and repeating the process until the present value as of April 15, 1996 was determined. The sum of present values of the profit earned on breached sales in each year of the post-suspension period equals the total net present value as of the midpoint of the suspension period of all profits earned on the breached sales in the post-suspension period. The profits for FYE 3/31/97 were earned after the lifting of the suspension on December 4, 1996. Therefore the mid-point of these profits for discounting purposes is February 1, 1997. Performing this discounting is absolutely required in order to properly carry out the order of the court to subtract dollars earned in one time period from lost profits incurred in another.

Tab E E2

Page 3 of 3